Abstract 225P
Background
Common evolution of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is local recurrence or progression to muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Some patients (pts) with NMIBC might develop metastases without progression to MIBC. Clinical evolution of these atypical presentations is unknown. Bladder cancer over the last 5 years has surged by over 13% in India. 50-70% of NMIBC cases recur, and around 10-20% progress to MIBC. Challenge in treatment is identifying the patients with mutations or gene expression patterns for targeted therapy, which is not feasible for all owing to high cost. While omics categorized Western patients, molecular landscape of Indian NMIBC remains incomplete. Herein we report a potential predictive signature, derived by combining transcriptome and whole exome sequencing data of a cohort of NMIBC patients treated in our centre.
Methods
From 2018 to 2021, 25 pts treated at our centre were included for the study, which has been approved by Institutional Ethics committee. Median age at diagnosis was 64Y. 88% received intravesical BCG. 60% were T1 stage and recurrence rate 48%. RNA sequencing and whole exome sequencing were performed on 25 primary NMBIC tumors. Machine learning model was used to predict recurrence status. Mutational status between recurrent and non-recurrent patients was also obtained. The gene expression signature was validated in external datasets including GSE13507 and GSE154261.
Results
435 genes were differentially expressed between recurred and non-recurred patients (p<0.05). Machine learning model predicted recurrence with 90% accuracy. Top pathways upregulated include signalling by nuclear receptors, Shigellosis etc. Downregulated include cell adhesion, PIK-AKT, and ECM reorganization. Validation in external dataset correlated positively with p<0.05. In addition to most previously reported signatures and APOBEC, we also found mutations in FGFR3, ABC transporters, and DAMP, differentially regulated between recurred vs non recurred patients.
Conclusions
We identified novel differentially regulated genes and mutations in genes that predicts recurrence with 90% accuracy. Further analysis in a larger set is underway to complete the validation of the predictive model.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Center.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract