Abstract 163P
Background
Though there are multiple drugs approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), high cost can be a limiting factor in using them in a resource-limited setting. It is important to have less expensive alternatives in low-middle-income countries so that majority of the patients can have access to such a medications. We are sharing our experience in using Fosfesterol which is a cheap and orally administered estrogen analogue in metastatic CRPC.
Methods
This is a retrospective study done in a high-volume cancer center in South India. Case records of patients with CRPC who received low-dose oral Fosfestrol (120 mg three times a day) were reviewed and baseline characteristics, treatment details, outcomes, and toxicity details were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used wherever appropriate, and survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meir method.
Results
A total of 65 patients received Fosfesterol during the study period. The median age was 65 years (range 50-83 years). Thirty-four patients (53%) had other medical comorbidities.Skeletal only metastasis was commonest pattern of metastasis (n= 41,64%) followed by skeletal with nodal metastasis (n=15,23%). The majority of the patients had upfront surgical castration (n=60,93%). All the patients had adenocarcinoma and 38 patients (58%) had a high Gleason’s score (GS). Twelve patients (19%) had a GS of 7 and 5 patients (8%) had a GS of 6. GS was not available in 10 patients (15%). Forty-one patients (63%) had a PSA response (decrease of ≥50% in the PSA concentration from the baseline PSA value) and 54 patients (83%) had a symptomatic response. At the end of a median follow-up of 16 months, Median PFS was 8.3 months (CI 4.7-11.8) and the median OS was 27.5 months (CI 25.4-29.5). Twenty-nine patients (45%) received some form of subsequent treatment after stopping Fosfesterol. Most common toxicity observed was thrombosis (n=9,13%) followed by gynecomastia (n=4,6%).
Conclusions
Oral Fosfesterol is a cheap and effective agent in metastatic CRPC with a favorable toxicity profile. More studies are required to define the exact role of this drug in the management of metastatic CRPC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
197P - The risk of uterine cervical cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Hee Man Kim
Session: Poster viewing 03
198P - Geographic and demographic access to brachytherapy in India, with a special emphasis on gynaecological cancers
Presenter: Abhishek Krishna
Session: Poster viewing 03
199P - Prevalence of cervical cancer in Uzbekistan: A population based study
Presenter: Sayde Djanklich
Session: Poster viewing 03
200P - A retrospective institutional analysis on gynecological malignant mixed Mullerian tumors
Presenter: Monik Patel
Session: Poster viewing 03
201P - Immunotherapy in advanced mismatch repair deficiency endometrial cancer: A real-world single center experience
Presenter: Amit Rauthan
Session: Poster viewing 03
203TiP - Autophagy as a target for therapy in ovarian cancer: A phase II randomized trial with biomarker correlation (ATOC Trial)
Presenter: Luxitaa Goenka
Session: Poster viewing 03
210P - Ultra-sensitive monitoring of leukemia patients using superRCA mutation detection assays
Presenter: Lei Chen
Session: Poster viewing 03
211P - Chemotherapy delivery time affects anti-lymphoma treatment outcome in a sex-dependent manner
Presenter: Yeonsoo Park
Session: Poster viewing 03