Abstract 203TiP
Background
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is gynecologic cancer with one of the highest mortalities. First-line treatment usually involves cytoreductive surgery and six cycles of platinum and taxane chemotherapy. With this treatment, most (70-80%) patients with stage III/IV disease relapse after one year. Patients who require re-treatment >6 months after previous platinum exposure [platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PS-ROC)] are usually treated with a combination containing platinum agent. Autophagy pathways are activated in relapsed ovarian cancer allowing cancer cells to survive chemotherapy-induced stress. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an autophagy inhibitor that inhibits the autophagosome's fusion with the lysosome.
Trial design
Study design: Randomized Phase II Study Key inclusion criteria: 1. Platinum-sensitive-relapsed-(serous-epithelial)-ovarian cancer. 2. Measurable disease (elevated CA-125 or measurable by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria) at the time of study enrolment. 3. Age ≥ 18 years. 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. 5. Acceptable bone marrow and organ function. Sample Size: The response rate of standard therapy is about 60-65%. Addition of hydroxychloroquine to demonstrate an improvement in response rate of 15% (one-sided alpha: 5%; power: 80%); initial estimate was 56 (n=28 patients in each arm). With a 10% drop-out, the sample size will be 62 (n=31 in each arm). Study Procedure: Eligible patients will be randomized to receive either standard therapy or standard therapy along with hydroxychloroquine (200 mg BD). After the completion of 3 cycles, the patients will be assessed for response. For correlative studies, blood samples will be collected at baseline and end of 3 cycles. Standard Therapy: 3 weekly Carboplatin+ paclitaxel/gemcitabine or weekly paclitaxel+carboplatin Objectives: 1. To compare the response rates of patients after 3 cycles using RECIST 1.1 criteria. 2. To study the biomarkers of autophagy at baseline and after 3 cycles. 3. To study progression-free survival and overall survival. 4. To assess the toxicity. 5. To assess the quality of life at baseline and after 3 cycles.
Clinical trial identification
CTRI/2020/06/025790.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Dr Prasanth Ganesan, Ms Luxitaa Goenka, JIPMER, Puducherry.
Funding
Indian Council of Medical Research.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
140P - Lenvatinib + everolimus in mRCC that has progressed on immunotherapy: A real-world single center experience
Presenter: CHINNU JOMI
Session: Poster viewing 03
141P - Real-world study of cabozantinib treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in Taiwan
Presenter: Yu-Chieh Tsai
Session: Poster viewing 03
143P - Clinical outcomes of systemic therapy for hemodialysis patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Iwasa
Session: Poster viewing 03
144P - Association between immune-related adverse events and survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab
Presenter: Takanori Hayase
Session: Poster viewing 03
145P - Treatment outcomes and FGFR alterations in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer in Taiwan
Presenter: Jian-Ri Li
Session: Poster viewing 03
146P - Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A propensity score-matched Chinese cohort
Presenter: WAICHAN LOK
Session: Poster viewing 03
Resources:
Abstract
147P - Activity of single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in 1st-line (1L) “platinum-ineligible” patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) in real-life clinical practice
Presenter: Javier Molina Cerrillo
Session: Poster viewing 03
149P - A need for clear definitions and improved management for BCG-unresponsive tumors in Asia-Pacific
Presenter: Lui Shiong Lee
Session: Poster viewing 03
Resources:
Abstract