Abstract 163P
Background
Though there are multiple drugs approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), high cost can be a limiting factor in using them in a resource-limited setting. It is important to have less expensive alternatives in low-middle-income countries so that majority of the patients can have access to such a medications. We are sharing our experience in using Fosfesterol which is a cheap and orally administered estrogen analogue in metastatic CRPC.
Methods
This is a retrospective study done in a high-volume cancer center in South India. Case records of patients with CRPC who received low-dose oral Fosfestrol (120 mg three times a day) were reviewed and baseline characteristics, treatment details, outcomes, and toxicity details were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used wherever appropriate, and survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meir method.
Results
A total of 65 patients received Fosfesterol during the study period. The median age was 65 years (range 50-83 years). Thirty-four patients (53%) had other medical comorbidities.Skeletal only metastasis was commonest pattern of metastasis (n= 41,64%) followed by skeletal with nodal metastasis (n=15,23%). The majority of the patients had upfront surgical castration (n=60,93%). All the patients had adenocarcinoma and 38 patients (58%) had a high Gleason’s score (GS). Twelve patients (19%) had a GS of 7 and 5 patients (8%) had a GS of 6. GS was not available in 10 patients (15%). Forty-one patients (63%) had a PSA response (decrease of ≥50% in the PSA concentration from the baseline PSA value) and 54 patients (83%) had a symptomatic response. At the end of a median follow-up of 16 months, Median PFS was 8.3 months (CI 4.7-11.8) and the median OS was 27.5 months (CI 25.4-29.5). Twenty-nine patients (45%) received some form of subsequent treatment after stopping Fosfesterol. Most common toxicity observed was thrombosis (n=9,13%) followed by gynecomastia (n=4,6%).
Conclusions
Oral Fosfesterol is a cheap and effective agent in metastatic CRPC with a favorable toxicity profile. More studies are required to define the exact role of this drug in the management of metastatic CRPC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
265P - Tumor-agonistic genomic profiling
Presenter: Naomi Hayashi
Session: Poster viewing 03
266P - Dynamic mutation profiles of Chinese patients with EGFR T790M advanced NSCLC receiving osimertinib
Presenter: Xuchao Zhang
Session: Poster viewing 03
267P - Genomic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in India using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in clinical practice
Presenter: Amit Rauthan
Session: Poster viewing 03
269P - MET alterations in EGFR mutated NSCLC: A lesser known evil
Presenter: Mansi Sharma
Session: Poster viewing 03
271P - Prospective study on toxicity profile of immunotherapy in a Indian population: A real-world experience
Presenter: Kaushik R
Session: Poster viewing 03