Abstract 163P
Background
Though there are multiple drugs approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), high cost can be a limiting factor in using them in a resource-limited setting. It is important to have less expensive alternatives in low-middle-income countries so that majority of the patients can have access to such a medications. We are sharing our experience in using Fosfesterol which is a cheap and orally administered estrogen analogue in metastatic CRPC.
Methods
This is a retrospective study done in a high-volume cancer center in South India. Case records of patients with CRPC who received low-dose oral Fosfestrol (120 mg three times a day) were reviewed and baseline characteristics, treatment details, outcomes, and toxicity details were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used wherever appropriate, and survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meir method.
Results
A total of 65 patients received Fosfesterol during the study period. The median age was 65 years (range 50-83 years). Thirty-four patients (53%) had other medical comorbidities.Skeletal only metastasis was commonest pattern of metastasis (n= 41,64%) followed by skeletal with nodal metastasis (n=15,23%). The majority of the patients had upfront surgical castration (n=60,93%). All the patients had adenocarcinoma and 38 patients (58%) had a high Gleason’s score (GS). Twelve patients (19%) had a GS of 7 and 5 patients (8%) had a GS of 6. GS was not available in 10 patients (15%). Forty-one patients (63%) had a PSA response (decrease of ≥50% in the PSA concentration from the baseline PSA value) and 54 patients (83%) had a symptomatic response. At the end of a median follow-up of 16 months, Median PFS was 8.3 months (CI 4.7-11.8) and the median OS was 27.5 months (CI 25.4-29.5). Twenty-nine patients (45%) received some form of subsequent treatment after stopping Fosfesterol. Most common toxicity observed was thrombosis (n=9,13%) followed by gynecomastia (n=4,6%).
Conclusions
Oral Fosfesterol is a cheap and effective agent in metastatic CRPC with a favorable toxicity profile. More studies are required to define the exact role of this drug in the management of metastatic CRPC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
247TiP - Addition of induction, concurrent and maintenance durvalumab to induction and concurrent chemoradiation vs induction and concurrent chemoradiation for previously untreated locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A phase II randomised-controlled trial
Presenter: Victor Lee
Session: Poster viewing 03
248P - The use of complementary medicine in Chinese pediatric patients receiving palliative care: A multi-centre study
Presenter: Chun SIng Lam
Session: Poster viewing 03
249P - Improving quality of life and symptom burden with opioids and adjuncts in lung cancer (IQSOL study)
Presenter: Naren Gokulanathan
Session: Poster viewing 03
250P - An analysis of nutritional and psychological status of patients with advanced cancer
Presenter: Shasha Wang
Session: Poster viewing 03
251P - Is QUAD SHOT palliative cyclical hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer the way to go? An alternative regimen in low resource countries
Presenter: Ravi Kanodia
Session: Poster viewing 03
252P - Preferred place of death among terminally ill cancer patients: A single centre observational study from India
Presenter: Suhana Sulfiker
Session: Poster viewing 03
253P - Hemostatic radiotherapy for gastric cancer: MRI as an alternative to endoscopy for post-treatment evaluation
Presenter: Osamu Tanaka
Session: Poster viewing 03
254P - Sexual function of cervical cancer survivors: A single center prospective study
Presenter: Dinesh Ravikumar
Session: Poster viewing 03
255P - Volunteers’ role to provide quality palliative care for terminal cancer
Presenter: SAPTAPARNA JANA
Session: Poster viewing 03