Abstract 151P
Background
The optimal management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) consists of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. While adjuvant chemotherapy is used, there is a lack of high-level evidence to support this approach. We analysed the effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for MIBC in an Australian real-world population, described patterns of chemotherapy use and explored differences between treatment groups.
Methods
The BLADDA registry, a multicentre Australian registry of muscle-invasive and advanced urothelial cancer, was searched to identify patients with MIBC treated with curative-intent surgery. Clinical, pathological and survival data were analysed. Differences between patients treated with and without chemotherapy were tested using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable proportional hazards models were used to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone.
Results
158 patients underwent surgery for MIBC between 2006 and 2022. 36.7% were given neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 20.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 43.0% had surgery only. The proportion of patients given neoadjuvant chemotherapy rose from 8.1% in 2006-2015 to 60.5% in 2020-2022. Compared to surgery alone, RFS was improved in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82, p=0.014) or adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.75, p=0.006). OS was longer in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.93, p=0.034) but not in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.20-1.13, p=0.092). Patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy if they were older (OR 0.92 [age as a continuous variable], 95% CI 0.87-0.97, p=0.003) or had renal impairment (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.86, p=0.025).
Conclusions
In a real-world analysis of Australian patients with MIBC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS and OS, but adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS only. Older patients and those with renal impairment were less likely to be treated with chemotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute for Medical Research.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
140P - Lenvatinib + everolimus in mRCC that has progressed on immunotherapy: A real-world single center experience
Presenter: CHINNU JOMI
Session: Poster viewing 03
141P - Real-world study of cabozantinib treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in Taiwan
Presenter: Yu-Chieh Tsai
Session: Poster viewing 03
143P - Clinical outcomes of systemic therapy for hemodialysis patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Iwasa
Session: Poster viewing 03
144P - Association between immune-related adverse events and survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab
Presenter: Takanori Hayase
Session: Poster viewing 03
145P - Treatment outcomes and FGFR alterations in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer in Taiwan
Presenter: Jian-Ri Li
Session: Poster viewing 03
146P - Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A propensity score-matched Chinese cohort
Presenter: WAICHAN LOK
Session: Poster viewing 03
Resources:
Abstract
147P - Activity of single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in 1st-line (1L) “platinum-ineligible” patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) in real-life clinical practice
Presenter: Javier Molina Cerrillo
Session: Poster viewing 03
149P - A need for clear definitions and improved management for BCG-unresponsive tumors in Asia-Pacific
Presenter: Lui Shiong Lee
Session: Poster viewing 03
Resources:
Abstract