Abstract 151P
Background
The optimal management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) consists of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. While adjuvant chemotherapy is used, there is a lack of high-level evidence to support this approach. We analysed the effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for MIBC in an Australian real-world population, described patterns of chemotherapy use and explored differences between treatment groups.
Methods
The BLADDA registry, a multicentre Australian registry of muscle-invasive and advanced urothelial cancer, was searched to identify patients with MIBC treated with curative-intent surgery. Clinical, pathological and survival data were analysed. Differences between patients treated with and without chemotherapy were tested using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable proportional hazards models were used to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone.
Results
158 patients underwent surgery for MIBC between 2006 and 2022. 36.7% were given neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 20.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 43.0% had surgery only. The proportion of patients given neoadjuvant chemotherapy rose from 8.1% in 2006-2015 to 60.5% in 2020-2022. Compared to surgery alone, RFS was improved in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82, p=0.014) or adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.75, p=0.006). OS was longer in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.93, p=0.034) but not in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.20-1.13, p=0.092). Patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy if they were older (OR 0.92 [age as a continuous variable], 95% CI 0.87-0.97, p=0.003) or had renal impairment (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.86, p=0.025).
Conclusions
In a real-world analysis of Australian patients with MIBC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS and OS, but adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS only. Older patients and those with renal impairment were less likely to be treated with chemotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute for Medical Research.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
265P - Tumor-agonistic genomic profiling
Presenter: Naomi Hayashi
Session: Poster viewing 03
266P - Dynamic mutation profiles of Chinese patients with EGFR T790M advanced NSCLC receiving osimertinib
Presenter: Xuchao Zhang
Session: Poster viewing 03
267P - Genomic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in India using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in clinical practice
Presenter: Amit Rauthan
Session: Poster viewing 03
269P - MET alterations in EGFR mutated NSCLC: A lesser known evil
Presenter: Mansi Sharma
Session: Poster viewing 03
271P - Prospective study on toxicity profile of immunotherapy in a Indian population: A real-world experience
Presenter: Kaushik R
Session: Poster viewing 03