Abstract 151P
Background
The optimal management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) consists of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. While adjuvant chemotherapy is used, there is a lack of high-level evidence to support this approach. We analysed the effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for MIBC in an Australian real-world population, described patterns of chemotherapy use and explored differences between treatment groups.
Methods
The BLADDA registry, a multicentre Australian registry of muscle-invasive and advanced urothelial cancer, was searched to identify patients with MIBC treated with curative-intent surgery. Clinical, pathological and survival data were analysed. Differences between patients treated with and without chemotherapy were tested using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable proportional hazards models were used to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone.
Results
158 patients underwent surgery for MIBC between 2006 and 2022. 36.7% were given neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 20.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 43.0% had surgery only. The proportion of patients given neoadjuvant chemotherapy rose from 8.1% in 2006-2015 to 60.5% in 2020-2022. Compared to surgery alone, RFS was improved in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82, p=0.014) or adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.75, p=0.006). OS was longer in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.93, p=0.034) but not in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.20-1.13, p=0.092). Patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy if they were older (OR 0.92 [age as a continuous variable], 95% CI 0.87-0.97, p=0.003) or had renal impairment (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.86, p=0.025).
Conclusions
In a real-world analysis of Australian patients with MIBC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS and OS, but adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS only. Older patients and those with renal impairment were less likely to be treated with chemotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute for Medical Research.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
197P - The risk of uterine cervical cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Hee Man Kim
Session: Poster viewing 03
198P - Geographic and demographic access to brachytherapy in India, with a special emphasis on gynaecological cancers
Presenter: Abhishek Krishna
Session: Poster viewing 03
199P - Prevalence of cervical cancer in Uzbekistan: A population based study
Presenter: Sayde Djanklich
Session: Poster viewing 03
200P - A retrospective institutional analysis on gynecological malignant mixed Mullerian tumors
Presenter: Monik Patel
Session: Poster viewing 03
201P - Immunotherapy in advanced mismatch repair deficiency endometrial cancer: A real-world single center experience
Presenter: Amit Rauthan
Session: Poster viewing 03
203TiP - Autophagy as a target for therapy in ovarian cancer: A phase II randomized trial with biomarker correlation (ATOC Trial)
Presenter: Luxitaa Goenka
Session: Poster viewing 03
210P - Ultra-sensitive monitoring of leukemia patients using superRCA mutation detection assays
Presenter: Lei Chen
Session: Poster viewing 03
211P - Chemotherapy delivery time affects anti-lymphoma treatment outcome in a sex-dependent manner
Presenter: Yeonsoo Park
Session: Poster viewing 03