Abstract 99P
Background
It is unclear whether the UGT1A1 status, single heterozygous (SH) or wild type (WT), is associated with the efficacy and safety of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Methods
We compared the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV by UGT1A1 status, WT versus SH, among the patients enrolled in our retrospective cohort study HGCSG2101 which is analyzed real-world data of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in Japanese patients with PDAC. The median overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) with each 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor response was assessed by RECIST ver. 1.1. Adverse events were evaluated according to CTCAE ver. 5.0.
Results
A total of 48 patients were evaluated (26 and 22 patients with UGT1A1 WT and SH, respectively). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95%CI: 1.85-6.92) in WT group and 2.4 months (95%CI: 1.85-6.00) in SH group, respectively (HR: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.63–2.14, p=0.63). The median OS was 6.6 months (95%CI: 4.65-11.33) in WT group and 6.8 months (95%CI: 4.26-9.42) in SH group (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.51–2.13, p=0.90), respectively. The response rate was 8.0% (95%CI: 1.69-26.10) in WT group and 16.7% (95%CI: 5.01-40.05) in SH group (p= 0.63), respectively. Though there were no significant differences in safety between WT and SH groups, ≥grade3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia(FN) were observed more frequent in SH group (≥grade3 neutropenia: 30.8% vs 50.0%, p=0.24, FN: 0.0% vs 9.1%, p=0.20, respectively). No treatment-related death was observed in each group.
Conclusions
There was no significant difference in the treatment outcome of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV between UGT1A1 WT and SH groups. However, ≥grade3 neutropenia and FN was more frequent in SH group. Further analysis is needed to investigate the impact of the UGT1A1 status on the treatment outcome of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV for patients with PDAC. These results were previously reported in the ESMO World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer 2022 (#SO-30).
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Hokkaido gastrointestinal cancer study group (HGCSG).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
48P - Long-term clinical outcomes after the second metastasectomy in patients (pts) with resected metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Songji Choi
Session: Poster viewing 02
49P - Ramucirumab beyond progression plus TAS 102 in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or the gastroesophageal junction, after treatment failure on a ramucirumab based therapy: Final results of the phase II RE-ExPEL study
Presenter: Thorsten Goetze
Session: Poster viewing 02
50P - Linear tumor regression of rectal cancer in daily MRI during preoperative chemoradiotherapy: An insight of tumor regression velocity for personalized cancer therapy
Presenter: Sea-Won Lee
Session: Poster viewing 02
51P - Efficacy and safety of sintilimab as first-line therapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study
Presenter: Caiyun Nie
Session: Poster viewing 02
53P - Baseline PET/CT deep radiomics signature apply for identifying bevacizumab sensitivity of RAS-mutant colorectal cancer liver metastases patients
Presenter: Wenju Chang
Session: Poster viewing 02
54P - Efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Yakup Ergün
Session: Poster viewing 02
55P - Biodegradable and biocompatible 3D-printed scaffolds loaded with chemotherapy drugs: A new horizon for treatment of colon cancer with diffuse intraperitoneal metastasis
Presenter: Amirhosein Kefayat
Session: Poster viewing 02
56P - Clinico-pathological profile of adolescent and young adult colorectal cancer patients: Multicentre collaborative registry data from India
Presenter: Soumya Surath Panda
Session: Poster viewing 02