Abstract 99P
Background
It is unclear whether the UGT1A1 status, single heterozygous (SH) or wild type (WT), is associated with the efficacy and safety of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Methods
We compared the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV by UGT1A1 status, WT versus SH, among the patients enrolled in our retrospective cohort study HGCSG2101 which is analyzed real-world data of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in Japanese patients with PDAC. The median overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) with each 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor response was assessed by RECIST ver. 1.1. Adverse events were evaluated according to CTCAE ver. 5.0.
Results
A total of 48 patients were evaluated (26 and 22 patients with UGT1A1 WT and SH, respectively). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95%CI: 1.85-6.92) in WT group and 2.4 months (95%CI: 1.85-6.00) in SH group, respectively (HR: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.63–2.14, p=0.63). The median OS was 6.6 months (95%CI: 4.65-11.33) in WT group and 6.8 months (95%CI: 4.26-9.42) in SH group (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.51–2.13, p=0.90), respectively. The response rate was 8.0% (95%CI: 1.69-26.10) in WT group and 16.7% (95%CI: 5.01-40.05) in SH group (p= 0.63), respectively. Though there were no significant differences in safety between WT and SH groups, ≥grade3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia(FN) were observed more frequent in SH group (≥grade3 neutropenia: 30.8% vs 50.0%, p=0.24, FN: 0.0% vs 9.1%, p=0.20, respectively). No treatment-related death was observed in each group.
Conclusions
There was no significant difference in the treatment outcome of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV between UGT1A1 WT and SH groups. However, ≥grade3 neutropenia and FN was more frequent in SH group. Further analysis is needed to investigate the impact of the UGT1A1 status on the treatment outcome of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV for patients with PDAC. These results were previously reported in the ESMO World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer 2022 (#SO-30).
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Hokkaido gastrointestinal cancer study group (HGCSG).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
109P - Economic evaluation of second-line treatment for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review
Presenter: Gagandeep Kaur
Session: Poster viewing 02
110P - Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of poor prognosis in advanced esophageal cancer
Presenter: Chaichana Chantharakhit
Session: Poster viewing 02
111P - Bicentric real-life analysis of the molecular portrait of patients with early onset metastatic biliary tract cancer
Presenter: Theresa Schmalfuss
Session: Poster viewing 02
112P - Prognostic role of sarcopenia before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: A retrospective study
Presenter: Mastaneh Sanei
Session: Poster viewing 02
113P - Brain metastases in esophageal cancer patients who have been treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: An inconsiderable complication
Presenter: Jun Liu
Session: Poster viewing 02
114P - Risk factors for oesophageal fistula: A life-threatening complication of treatment for oesophageal cancer
Presenter: Reo Omori
Session: Poster viewing 02
115P - Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) expression status in patients with cholangiocarcinoma
Presenter: Thanit Imemkamon
Session: Poster viewing 02
116P - Spleen as an organ at risk (OAR) in adjuvant chemoradiotherapy of gastric cancer: Retrospective dosimetric single institutional experience
Presenter: Preethi Shetty
Session: Poster viewing 02
117P - Immunoprofile of adenosquamous carcinoma in gastric cancer
Presenter: Cheng-Han Wu
Session: Poster viewing 02
118P - Association between stomach cancer with behavioral and dietary factors: A case control study from Nepal
Presenter: Arun Shahi
Session: Poster viewing 02