Abstract 99P
Background
It is unclear whether the UGT1A1 status, single heterozygous (SH) or wild type (WT), is associated with the efficacy and safety of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Methods
We compared the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV by UGT1A1 status, WT versus SH, among the patients enrolled in our retrospective cohort study HGCSG2101 which is analyzed real-world data of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in Japanese patients with PDAC. The median overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) with each 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor response was assessed by RECIST ver. 1.1. Adverse events were evaluated according to CTCAE ver. 5.0.
Results
A total of 48 patients were evaluated (26 and 22 patients with UGT1A1 WT and SH, respectively). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95%CI: 1.85-6.92) in WT group and 2.4 months (95%CI: 1.85-6.00) in SH group, respectively (HR: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.63–2.14, p=0.63). The median OS was 6.6 months (95%CI: 4.65-11.33) in WT group and 6.8 months (95%CI: 4.26-9.42) in SH group (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.51–2.13, p=0.90), respectively. The response rate was 8.0% (95%CI: 1.69-26.10) in WT group and 16.7% (95%CI: 5.01-40.05) in SH group (p= 0.63), respectively. Though there were no significant differences in safety between WT and SH groups, ≥grade3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia(FN) were observed more frequent in SH group (≥grade3 neutropenia: 30.8% vs 50.0%, p=0.24, FN: 0.0% vs 9.1%, p=0.20, respectively). No treatment-related death was observed in each group.
Conclusions
There was no significant difference in the treatment outcome of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV between UGT1A1 WT and SH groups. However, ≥grade3 neutropenia and FN was more frequent in SH group. Further analysis is needed to investigate the impact of the UGT1A1 status on the treatment outcome of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV for patients with PDAC. These results were previously reported in the ESMO World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer 2022 (#SO-30).
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Hokkaido gastrointestinal cancer study group (HGCSG).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
79P - Outcomes by baseline liver function in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tremelimumab and durvalumab in the phase III HIMALAYA study
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Poster viewing 02
82P - A randomized controlled, open-label, adaptive phase III clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of EndoTAG-1 plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with measurable locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after FOLFIRINOX
Presenter: Muh-Hwan Su
Session: Poster viewing 02
83P - Impact of viral aetiology in the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)
Presenter: Stephen Chan
Session: Poster viewing 02
84P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A large real life worldwide population
Presenter: Margherita Rimini
Session: Poster viewing 02
86P - Outcomes by primary tumour location in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in the phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster viewing 02
87P - Socio-demographic disparities in esophageal cancer: A SEER analysis
Presenter: Beas Siromoni
Session: Poster viewing 02