Abstract 299P
Background
Nasopharyngeal cancer is the most common head and neck cancer in Indonesia with prevalence of 28.4% among all adult head and neck cancer. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the main modalities for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment, With proper treatment, patients with nasopharyngeal cancer would have 5-year survival rate of above 80%, even in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer. However toxicity associated with nasopharyngeal cancer treatment is quite burdensome for the patients especially toxicity in terms of hematology, mucositis, nausea, and vomiting. Due to the burdening toxicity of chemoradiation treatment for the patients, several chemotherapy schedules were attempted. We aimed to search and elucidate high quality evidence available to date to answer our clinical question, whether triweekly or weekly concurrent chemoradiation is better for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment in terms of survival.
Methods
Literature searching was conducted on 3 databases: PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Scopus using keyword “Nasopharyngeal Cancer”, “Weekly Chemotherapy”, “Triweekly Chemotherapy”, “Overall Survival” and its synonyms using both MeSH and non-MeSH terms. Critical Appraisal for selected studies was done by 3 different person, using CEBM Critical Appraisals Tools.
Results
Six studies were selected to be relevant after elaborate search, which was then critically apprasied and found to be valid. Results from all those 6 studies found that weekly vs. triweekly chemoradiation regimen leads to similar survival outcome in nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Overall Survival (OS) rates from those 6 studies showed comparable result among both regimens (3-Year OS, 91% vs 90.8%; 5-year OS, 89% vs. 91%, 85.6% vs 90%, 78.9% vs 85.2%) and, all OS rate outcomes didn’t reach significant difference for all 6 studies.
Conclusions
Weekly and triweekly chemoradiation regimens for nasopharyngeal cancer were shown to be similar in terms of overall survival. The choice of weekly or triweekly chemoradiation for nasopharyngeal cancer patient should tailored according to institutional condition and capability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
27P - The prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and 18F-FDG PET SUV in breast cancer patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Soong June Bae
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
28P - Accuracy of core biopsy in predicting pathologic complete response in the breast in patients with complete/near complete clinical and radiological response (Complete Responders in the Breast – CRBr): A feasibility study
Presenter: Nisha Hariharan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
29P - Tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Routine pathologic markers improve the predictive power of a cell-loss metric based on release of thymidine kinase 1 into blood
Presenter: Bernhard Tribukait
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Comparison of metabolic changes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer
Presenter: Ho-hyun Ryu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Circulating miR-155 as a potential therapeutic monitoring marker in breast cancer
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Profile of breast cancer epidemiology in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar, Bali from 2012 to 2019
Presenter: Citra Aryanti
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
33P - Contrast enhanced chest CT in patients with breast cancer: Comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with biological markers
Presenter: Bo Hwa Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Verification of metabolic regulatory mechanisms in androgen receptor-positive triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Yuka Asano
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
35TiP - Ribociclib plus goserelin with hormonal therapy versus physician choice chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (ABC): RIGHT choice study
Presenter: Yen-Shen Lu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
36TiP - A prospective study to assess response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer at a regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Shina Goyal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract