Abstract 299P
Background
Nasopharyngeal cancer is the most common head and neck cancer in Indonesia with prevalence of 28.4% among all adult head and neck cancer. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the main modalities for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment, With proper treatment, patients with nasopharyngeal cancer would have 5-year survival rate of above 80%, even in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer. However toxicity associated with nasopharyngeal cancer treatment is quite burdensome for the patients especially toxicity in terms of hematology, mucositis, nausea, and vomiting. Due to the burdening toxicity of chemoradiation treatment for the patients, several chemotherapy schedules were attempted. We aimed to search and elucidate high quality evidence available to date to answer our clinical question, whether triweekly or weekly concurrent chemoradiation is better for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment in terms of survival.
Methods
Literature searching was conducted on 3 databases: PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Scopus using keyword “Nasopharyngeal Cancer”, “Weekly Chemotherapy”, “Triweekly Chemotherapy”, “Overall Survival” and its synonyms using both MeSH and non-MeSH terms. Critical Appraisal for selected studies was done by 3 different person, using CEBM Critical Appraisals Tools.
Results
Six studies were selected to be relevant after elaborate search, which was then critically apprasied and found to be valid. Results from all those 6 studies found that weekly vs. triweekly chemoradiation regimen leads to similar survival outcome in nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Overall Survival (OS) rates from those 6 studies showed comparable result among both regimens (3-Year OS, 91% vs 90.8%; 5-year OS, 89% vs. 91%, 85.6% vs 90%, 78.9% vs 85.2%) and, all OS rate outcomes didn’t reach significant difference for all 6 studies.
Conclusions
Weekly and triweekly chemoradiation regimens for nasopharyngeal cancer were shown to be similar in terms of overall survival. The choice of weekly or triweekly chemoradiation for nasopharyngeal cancer patient should tailored according to institutional condition and capability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
74TiP - Phase I study of BI 836880, a VEGF/Ang2-blocking nanobody®, as monotherapy and in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Kentaro Yamazaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
75P - A parallel deep learning network framework for whole-body bone scan image analysis
Presenter: Xiaorong Pu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
76P - Perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials
Presenter: Jukyung Jeon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
77P - A prognostic nomogram for the prediction of neuroblastoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
80P - The clinical usefulness of a new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes from surgically resected specimen in colorectal cancer: Prospective randomized study
Presenter: Shiki Fujino
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Concurrent or consolidation chemotherapy during radiation as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis from two prospective study
Presenter: JianWei Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
82P - Body mass index, tumour location, and colorectal cancer survival
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
83P - Helicobacter bilis may play a role in the carcinogenesis of colitis associated colon cancer correlating to increased number of CD4+CD45RB+ T cells
Presenter: Xiangsheng Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
84P - Comprehensive evaluation of relapse risk (CERR) score for colorectal liver metastases development and validation
Presenter: Jianmin Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
85P - Which is the best partner for capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer? A retrospective analysis of a comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract