Abstract 299P
Background
Nasopharyngeal cancer is the most common head and neck cancer in Indonesia with prevalence of 28.4% among all adult head and neck cancer. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the main modalities for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment, With proper treatment, patients with nasopharyngeal cancer would have 5-year survival rate of above 80%, even in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer. However toxicity associated with nasopharyngeal cancer treatment is quite burdensome for the patients especially toxicity in terms of hematology, mucositis, nausea, and vomiting. Due to the burdening toxicity of chemoradiation treatment for the patients, several chemotherapy schedules were attempted. We aimed to search and elucidate high quality evidence available to date to answer our clinical question, whether triweekly or weekly concurrent chemoradiation is better for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment in terms of survival.
Methods
Literature searching was conducted on 3 databases: PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Scopus using keyword “Nasopharyngeal Cancer”, “Weekly Chemotherapy”, “Triweekly Chemotherapy”, “Overall Survival” and its synonyms using both MeSH and non-MeSH terms. Critical Appraisal for selected studies was done by 3 different person, using CEBM Critical Appraisals Tools.
Results
Six studies were selected to be relevant after elaborate search, which was then critically apprasied and found to be valid. Results from all those 6 studies found that weekly vs. triweekly chemoradiation regimen leads to similar survival outcome in nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Overall Survival (OS) rates from those 6 studies showed comparable result among both regimens (3-Year OS, 91% vs 90.8%; 5-year OS, 89% vs. 91%, 85.6% vs 90%, 78.9% vs 85.2%) and, all OS rate outcomes didn’t reach significant difference for all 6 studies.
Conclusions
Weekly and triweekly chemoradiation regimens for nasopharyngeal cancer were shown to be similar in terms of overall survival. The choice of weekly or triweekly chemoradiation for nasopharyngeal cancer patient should tailored according to institutional condition and capability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
9P - XRCC1 Arg194Trp, Palb2 T1100T (3300T>G), HMMR V353A, TNF aG308A polymorphisms as diagnostic and prognostic markers of breast cancer in the Kyrgyz ethnic group
Presenter: Aigul Semetei kyzy
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
232P - Early Results from the Phase I Study of SY-1365, a Potent and Selective CDK7 inhibitor, in Patients with Ovarian Cancer and Advanced Solid Tumors
Presenter: Debra Richardson
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
382P - Drug metabolizing enzymes pharmacogenomic: Biomarkers for improved chemotherapy in head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Sunishtha Bhatia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
401P - Women in oncology: Alarming figures from India
Presenter: Sharada Mailankody
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
416P - Multidisciplinary management of sarcomas of the head and neck: An institutional experience
Presenter: Kavitha Jain
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
523P - Co-morbilities and survival of patients initially diagnosed with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Impact of hypertension, diabetes and chronic hepatitis B viral infection
Presenter: Weigang Xiu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
529P - Osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and asymptomatic brain metastases: An open-label, two-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Roni Gillis
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract