Abstract 299P
Background
Nasopharyngeal cancer is the most common head and neck cancer in Indonesia with prevalence of 28.4% among all adult head and neck cancer. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the main modalities for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment, With proper treatment, patients with nasopharyngeal cancer would have 5-year survival rate of above 80%, even in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer. However toxicity associated with nasopharyngeal cancer treatment is quite burdensome for the patients especially toxicity in terms of hematology, mucositis, nausea, and vomiting. Due to the burdening toxicity of chemoradiation treatment for the patients, several chemotherapy schedules were attempted. We aimed to search and elucidate high quality evidence available to date to answer our clinical question, whether triweekly or weekly concurrent chemoradiation is better for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment in terms of survival.
Methods
Literature searching was conducted on 3 databases: PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Scopus using keyword “Nasopharyngeal Cancer”, “Weekly Chemotherapy”, “Triweekly Chemotherapy”, “Overall Survival” and its synonyms using both MeSH and non-MeSH terms. Critical Appraisal for selected studies was done by 3 different person, using CEBM Critical Appraisals Tools.
Results
Six studies were selected to be relevant after elaborate search, which was then critically apprasied and found to be valid. Results from all those 6 studies found that weekly vs. triweekly chemoradiation regimen leads to similar survival outcome in nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Overall Survival (OS) rates from those 6 studies showed comparable result among both regimens (3-Year OS, 91% vs 90.8%; 5-year OS, 89% vs. 91%, 85.6% vs 90%, 78.9% vs 85.2%) and, all OS rate outcomes didn’t reach significant difference for all 6 studies.
Conclusions
Weekly and triweekly chemoradiation regimens for nasopharyngeal cancer were shown to be similar in terms of overall survival. The choice of weekly or triweekly chemoradiation for nasopharyngeal cancer patient should tailored according to institutional condition and capability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
154P - Genetic characteristics of participants in the Australian Pancreatic Screening Study
Presenter: Krithika Murali
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
155P - Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) is it a new prognostic marker in resectable carcinoma stomach?
Presenter: Girish M. S
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
156P - A positive feedback between IDO1 metabolite and COL12A1 via MAPK pathway to promote gastric cancer metastasis
Presenter: Zhen Xiang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
157P - Lymph node ratio (LNR) a better prognostic factor after D2 gastrectomy
Presenter: Jitin Yadav
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
158P - A clinical significance of preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer
Presenter: Kim Jinkook
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
159P - The relation between obesity and cancer of gastrointestinal tract in Korea: The data from Statistic Korea between 2001 and 2016
Presenter: Hee Man Kim
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
160P - Clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy after progression on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jooyoung Ha
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
161P - Chitinase 3-Like 1 gene (T/C) polymorphism and serum YKL-40 in hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Alshimaa Alhanafy
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
162P - Hypofractionated radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: Treatment response and prognostic factors affecting survival
Presenter: In Young Jo
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
163P - Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 and 2 (ERCC1/2) Single nucleotide polymorphisms and chemotherapy treatment outcome in Cholangiocarcinoma
Presenter: Thanachai Sanlung
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract