Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

155P - Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) is it a new prognostic marker in resectable carcinoma stomach?

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Presenters

Girish M. S

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix42-ix67. 10.1093/annonc/mdz422

Authors

G.M. M. S, R. Arjunan, C. Ramachandra, S. Altaf

Author affiliations

  • Surgical Oncologist, Kidwai Cancer Institute, 560029 - Bangalore/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 155P

Background

Increased mean platelet volume (MPV), an early marker of platelet activation has been shown to be associated with the pathophysiology of various cancers. However, studies analyzing the prognostic effect of MPV [Disease free survival (DFS) and Overall survival (OS)] in carcinoma stomach are lacking. This study was done to analyze the effect of MPV on DFS and OS of resectable carcinoma stomach patients.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of the data of 143 consecutively resected gastrectomy patients between 2009- 13 was done. Associations between MPV and Clinicopathological factors were assessed. DFS and OS for 5 years were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve.MPV of 10.5 femtolitres (fl) yielded maximum combined sensitivity and specificity on ROC curve. The area under curve(AUC) for MPV was 0.611. Therefore Preoperative cut-off value of MPV was taken as 10.5 fl. Differences between survival curves were tested for statistical significance using the log-rank test.

Results

Mean OS in the group with preoperative MPV < 10.5 vs > 10.5 was 59.3 vs 41.3 mts (95% CI = 58.81 – 60 vs 37.87 - 44.94; P = <0.0001). Mean OS in the group with postoperative (after one month) of MPV< 10.5 vs > 10.5 was 37.9 vs 29.2 mts (95% CI = 32-43.8vs 27.1- 19.8; P = <0.0001). Mean DFS in the group with preoperative MPV < 10.5 vs > 10.5 was 59.8 mts vs 38.2 mts (95% CI = 59.365-60.26 vs 31.798- 44.732; P = <0.0001). Mean DFS with postoperative (after one month) MPV< 10.5 vs > 10.5 58.0 mts vs 25.9 months (95% CI = 56.629 - 59.4 vs 20.841- 30.959; P = 0.012). These results show that MPV estimation both preoperatively and postoperative has a significant impact on both DFS and OS. And those patients who had increased MPV preoperatively had lower DFS and OS compared to those who had MPV lower at the initial presentation. Also, those patients who had initial high MPV which declined postoperatively after one month also had better DFS and OS compared to those who had persistent elevated MPV.

Conclusions

Hence MPV both preoperative and postoperative (1 month) shows to be a promising predictive factor in resectable carcinoma stomach.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.