Abstract 235P
Background
Radiation therapy (RT) is not a standard treatment for ovarian cancer (OC). However, it can be used as an adjunctive therapy to control the local recurrent disease. We aimed to investigate whether OC patients could benefit from RT.
Methods
From 2004 to 2013, the incidence, survival, treatment, and end results data from the SEER were analyzed for cases diagnosed with OC. We examined cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the effect of RT from multivariate Cox regression analysis. Performed propensity score matching (PSM) method was used for OC patients who received radiotherapy versus those who did not.
Results
A total of 11140 cases were enrolled for analysis. The aggregated HR of univariate survival analysis suggested that radiotherapy had unfavorable effects on overall survival (HR 1.315, 95% CI 0.994–1.739, P = 0.055) and cancer-specific survival (HR 1.732, 95% CI 1.285–2.334, P < 0.001), but there is no significant difference in multivariate analysis (OS HR 1.315, 95% CI 0.994–1.739, P = 0.055; CSS HR 1.222, 95% CI 0.905–1.651, P = 0.191). After PSM by 1:4, 655 patients were included. Both of the effect of radiotherapy in overall survival (HR 1.341, 95% CI 0.977–1.84, P = 0.070) and cancer-specific survival (HR 1.309, 95% CI 0.931–1.838, P = 0.121) were not significant ever in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis also found the same results (OS HR 1.232, 95% CI 0.894–1.699, P = 0.202; CSS HR 1.187, 95% CI 0.841–1.674, P = 0.330). Radiotherapy seems to have a reverse effect in regionally spread patients in stage II patients (before PMS HR 3.154, 95% CI 1.709-5.821, p < 0.01; after PMS HR = 3.543, 95% CI 1.603-7.834, p < 0.01) and non-epithelial OC patients (before PMS HR 1.748, 95% CI 1.219-2.507, p = 0.002; after PMS HR = 1.5422, 95% CI 1.021-2.329, p = 0.04).
Conclusions
In OC patients, RT does not have a proven benefit on CSS and OS overall, and it is especially not suitable for early-stage patients and non-epithelial OC patients. However, further confirmation is needed from well-designed and large-scale RCTs in the future to identify its effect in certain types of epithelial OC patients after the developed techniques.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
27P - The prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and 18F-FDG PET SUV in breast cancer patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Soong June Bae
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
28P - Accuracy of core biopsy in predicting pathologic complete response in the breast in patients with complete/near complete clinical and radiological response (Complete Responders in the Breast – CRBr): A feasibility study
Presenter: Nisha Hariharan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
29P - Tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Routine pathologic markers improve the predictive power of a cell-loss metric based on release of thymidine kinase 1 into blood
Presenter: Bernhard Tribukait
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Comparison of metabolic changes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer
Presenter: Ho-hyun Ryu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Circulating miR-155 as a potential therapeutic monitoring marker in breast cancer
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Profile of breast cancer epidemiology in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar, Bali from 2012 to 2019
Presenter: Citra Aryanti
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
33P - Contrast enhanced chest CT in patients with breast cancer: Comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with biological markers
Presenter: Bo Hwa Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Verification of metabolic regulatory mechanisms in androgen receptor-positive triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Yuka Asano
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
35TiP - Ribociclib plus goserelin with hormonal therapy versus physician choice chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (ABC): RIGHT choice study
Presenter: Yen-Shen Lu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
36TiP - A prospective study to assess response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer at a regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Shina Goyal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract