Abstract 235P
Background
Radiation therapy (RT) is not a standard treatment for ovarian cancer (OC). However, it can be used as an adjunctive therapy to control the local recurrent disease. We aimed to investigate whether OC patients could benefit from RT.
Methods
From 2004 to 2013, the incidence, survival, treatment, and end results data from the SEER were analyzed for cases diagnosed with OC. We examined cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the effect of RT from multivariate Cox regression analysis. Performed propensity score matching (PSM) method was used for OC patients who received radiotherapy versus those who did not.
Results
A total of 11140 cases were enrolled for analysis. The aggregated HR of univariate survival analysis suggested that radiotherapy had unfavorable effects on overall survival (HR 1.315, 95% CI 0.994–1.739, P = 0.055) and cancer-specific survival (HR 1.732, 95% CI 1.285–2.334, P < 0.001), but there is no significant difference in multivariate analysis (OS HR 1.315, 95% CI 0.994–1.739, P = 0.055; CSS HR 1.222, 95% CI 0.905–1.651, P = 0.191). After PSM by 1:4, 655 patients were included. Both of the effect of radiotherapy in overall survival (HR 1.341, 95% CI 0.977–1.84, P = 0.070) and cancer-specific survival (HR 1.309, 95% CI 0.931–1.838, P = 0.121) were not significant ever in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis also found the same results (OS HR 1.232, 95% CI 0.894–1.699, P = 0.202; CSS HR 1.187, 95% CI 0.841–1.674, P = 0.330). Radiotherapy seems to have a reverse effect in regionally spread patients in stage II patients (before PMS HR 3.154, 95% CI 1.709-5.821, p < 0.01; after PMS HR = 3.543, 95% CI 1.603-7.834, p < 0.01) and non-epithelial OC patients (before PMS HR 1.748, 95% CI 1.219-2.507, p = 0.002; after PMS HR = 1.5422, 95% CI 1.021-2.329, p = 0.04).
Conclusions
In OC patients, RT does not have a proven benefit on CSS and OS overall, and it is especially not suitable for early-stage patients and non-epithelial OC patients. However, further confirmation is needed from well-designed and large-scale RCTs in the future to identify its effect in certain types of epithelial OC patients after the developed techniques.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
9P - XRCC1 Arg194Trp, Palb2 T1100T (3300T>G), HMMR V353A, TNF aG308A polymorphisms as diagnostic and prognostic markers of breast cancer in the Kyrgyz ethnic group
Presenter: Aigul Semetei kyzy
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
232P - Early Results from the Phase I Study of SY-1365, a Potent and Selective CDK7 inhibitor, in Patients with Ovarian Cancer and Advanced Solid Tumors
Presenter: Debra Richardson
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
382P - Drug metabolizing enzymes pharmacogenomic: Biomarkers for improved chemotherapy in head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Sunishtha Bhatia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
401P - Women in oncology: Alarming figures from India
Presenter: Sharada Mailankody
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
416P - Multidisciplinary management of sarcomas of the head and neck: An institutional experience
Presenter: Kavitha Jain
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
523P - Co-morbilities and survival of patients initially diagnosed with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Impact of hypertension, diabetes and chronic hepatitis B viral infection
Presenter: Weigang Xiu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
529P - Osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and asymptomatic brain metastases: An open-label, two-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Roni Gillis
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract