Abstract 235P
Background
Radiation therapy (RT) is not a standard treatment for ovarian cancer (OC). However, it can be used as an adjunctive therapy to control the local recurrent disease. We aimed to investigate whether OC patients could benefit from RT.
Methods
From 2004 to 2013, the incidence, survival, treatment, and end results data from the SEER were analyzed for cases diagnosed with OC. We examined cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the effect of RT from multivariate Cox regression analysis. Performed propensity score matching (PSM) method was used for OC patients who received radiotherapy versus those who did not.
Results
A total of 11140 cases were enrolled for analysis. The aggregated HR of univariate survival analysis suggested that radiotherapy had unfavorable effects on overall survival (HR 1.315, 95% CI 0.994–1.739, P = 0.055) and cancer-specific survival (HR 1.732, 95% CI 1.285–2.334, P < 0.001), but there is no significant difference in multivariate analysis (OS HR 1.315, 95% CI 0.994–1.739, P = 0.055; CSS HR 1.222, 95% CI 0.905–1.651, P = 0.191). After PSM by 1:4, 655 patients were included. Both of the effect of radiotherapy in overall survival (HR 1.341, 95% CI 0.977–1.84, P = 0.070) and cancer-specific survival (HR 1.309, 95% CI 0.931–1.838, P = 0.121) were not significant ever in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis also found the same results (OS HR 1.232, 95% CI 0.894–1.699, P = 0.202; CSS HR 1.187, 95% CI 0.841–1.674, P = 0.330). Radiotherapy seems to have a reverse effect in regionally spread patients in stage II patients (before PMS HR 3.154, 95% CI 1.709-5.821, p < 0.01; after PMS HR = 3.543, 95% CI 1.603-7.834, p < 0.01) and non-epithelial OC patients (before PMS HR 1.748, 95% CI 1.219-2.507, p = 0.002; after PMS HR = 1.5422, 95% CI 1.021-2.329, p = 0.04).
Conclusions
In OC patients, RT does not have a proven benefit on CSS and OS overall, and it is especially not suitable for early-stage patients and non-epithelial OC patients. However, further confirmation is needed from well-designed and large-scale RCTs in the future to identify its effect in certain types of epithelial OC patients after the developed techniques.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
74TiP - Phase I study of BI 836880, a VEGF/Ang2-blocking nanobody®, as monotherapy and in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Kentaro Yamazaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
75P - A parallel deep learning network framework for whole-body bone scan image analysis
Presenter: Xiaorong Pu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
76P - Perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials
Presenter: Jukyung Jeon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
77P - A prognostic nomogram for the prediction of neuroblastoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
80P - The clinical usefulness of a new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes from surgically resected specimen in colorectal cancer: Prospective randomized study
Presenter: Shiki Fujino
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Concurrent or consolidation chemotherapy during radiation as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis from two prospective study
Presenter: JianWei Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
82P - Body mass index, tumour location, and colorectal cancer survival
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
83P - Helicobacter bilis may play a role in the carcinogenesis of colitis associated colon cancer correlating to increased number of CD4+CD45RB+ T cells
Presenter: Xiangsheng Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
84P - Comprehensive evaluation of relapse risk (CERR) score for colorectal liver metastases development and validation
Presenter: Jianmin Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
85P - Which is the best partner for capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer? A retrospective analysis of a comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract