Abstract 132P
Background
In the NAPOLI-1 phase 3 trial, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly increased median PFS (mPFS) vs 5-FU/LV (3.1 vs 1.5 months [mo], unstratified HR = 0.56, P = 0.0001) in pts with mPAC that progressed on prior gemcitabine-based therapy. This randomised phase 2 trial evaluated nalIRI+5FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese pts with gemcitabine-refractory mPAC (NCT02697058).Table:
132P
nal-IRI+5-FU/ LV n = 40 | 5-FU/ LV n = 39 | |
---|---|---|
PFS, mo (investigator assessed) | ||
Median | 2.7 | 1.5 |
95% CI | 1.5–5.0 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.60 | |
95% CI | 0.37–0.98 | |
P-value | 0.039 | |
PFS, mo (independently assessed) | ||
Median | 1.7 | 1.6 |
95% CI | 1.5–3.6 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.79 | |
95% CI | 0.47–1.32 | |
P-value | 0.376 | |
Best overall response, n (%) | 40 (100.0) | 39 (100.0) |
ORR | 8 (20.0) | 1 (2.6) |
P-value | 0.029 | |
Disease control rate, n (%) | 8 (20.0) | 2 (5.1) |
P-value | 0.087 | |
OS, mo | ||
Median | 6.3 | NR |
95% CI | 5.2–NR | 6.1–NR |
HR | 1.67 | |
95% CI | 0.88–3.16 | |
P-value | 0.110 | |
TTF, mo | ||
Median | 1.7 | 1.5 |
95% CI | 1.5–2.2 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.70 | |
95% CI | 0.44–1.12 | |
P-value | 0.134 | |
CA19-9 response rate,n/evaluable population (%) | 5/28 (17.9) | 1/28 (3.6) |
P-value | 0.193 |
Methods
This study assessed nal-IRI+5-FU/LV tolerability as per the NAPOLI-1 dosing regimen (Part 1), and safety and efficacy (Part 2). Part 2 outcomes are reported. Pts were randomised 1:1 and stratified by KPS (70 and 80 vs ≥ 90) and baseline albumin (≥4.0 g/dL vs < 4.0 g/dL). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were ORR, DCR, OS, TTF, CA199 response and QoL. The ITT population comprised all pts randomised.
Results
Differences in pt baseline characteristics were noted in the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 40/79) vs 5FU/LV (n = 39/79) arms, e.g. hepatic lesions (63% vs 51%), stage IV disease at diagnosis (78% vs 51%), and post-study anticancer therapy (55% vs 72%). Efficacy results are shown in the table. Investigator-assessed mPFS increase with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was clinically meaningful and statistically significant vs 5-FU/LV (2.7 vs 1.5 mo, P = 0.039). Independently-assessed mPFS showed a similar trend (1.7 vs 1.6 mo, P = 0.376). mOS was 6.3 mo with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and not reached with 5-FU/LV. DCR, TTF, CA19-9 and ORR response increased, ORR significantly, with nalIRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV. The most commonly reported grade ≥3 TEAEs with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV were decreased neutrophil count (37% vs 3%), decreased white blood cell count (20% vs 0) and diarrhoea (17% vs 3%).
Conclusions
Treatment with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was associated with clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator-assessed mPFS and ORR vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese patients, with no new or unexpected safety signals in this population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02697058.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support was provided by Christopher Lamb of Physicians World Europe GmbH, Mannheim, Germany and was funded by Servier Global Medical Affairs (Suresnes, France).
Legal entity responsible for the study
Servier and the authors.
Funding
Servier.
Disclosure
T. Ioka: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. M. Kanai: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TheraBioPharma Inc. M. Ikeda: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Bayer Yakuhin; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Kyowa Hakko Kirin; Research grant / Funding (self): Yakult; Research grant / Funding (self): Eli Lilly Japan; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Baxalta Japan Limited; Research grant / Funding (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (self): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (self): Nano Carrier; Research grant / Funding (self): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Takar Bio. T. Okusaka: Honoraria (self): Meiji Seika Pharma ; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): AbbVie Inc.; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Shire; Honoraria (self): ; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; Honoraria (self): Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma K.K.; Honoraria (self): Nobelpharma Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Pfizer Japan Inc.; Honoraria (self): FUJIFILM RI Pharma Co., Ltd ; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers K.K.; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca K.K.; Research grant / Funding (self): Baxter. J. Furuse: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. Y. Komatsu: Advisory / Consultancy: Yakult; Advisory / Consultancy: Taiho; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly. S. Shimizu: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte Corporation; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): Baxalta Japan; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Yakult; Research grant / Funding (institution): IQVIA Services Japan. P. Chugh: Full / Part-time employment: Servier. R. Tang: Full / Part-time employment: Servier. M. Ueno: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Shire; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Daiichi Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoCarrier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
221P - Comparative analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy for cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective real-world evidence
Presenter: Hsiang‐Lan Lai
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
222P - Does tumor grade really improve the prognostic ability of the staging system for men with penile cancer: A SEER database analysis
Presenter: Ravi Kanodia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
223TiP - EV-301: A phase III trial in progress evaluating enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
230P - Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) and newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC): SOLO1 China cohort
Presenter: Lingying Wu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
231P - Cost-effectiveness of olaparib vs routine surveillance in the maintenance setting for patients with BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in Singapore
Presenter: David SP Tan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
233P - Incorporation of correlative studies in ovarian cancers in the era of precision medicine: Assessment of accountability and utility
Presenter: Nadia Hitchen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
234P - Implementation of mainstream BRCA testing in epithelial ovarian cancer in a tertiary centre
Presenter: Edbert Wong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
235P - The efficacy of radiation therapy in ovarian carcinoma: A propensity score analysis of a population-based study
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
236P - Front-line maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: What’s next PARP inhibitors?
Presenter: Han Gong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
237P - PARP inhibitor in platinum resistant ovarian cancer: Single center real world experience
Presenter: Saphalta Baghmar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract