Abstract 132P
Background
In the NAPOLI-1 phase 3 trial, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly increased median PFS (mPFS) vs 5-FU/LV (3.1 vs 1.5 months [mo], unstratified HR = 0.56, P = 0.0001) in pts with mPAC that progressed on prior gemcitabine-based therapy. This randomised phase 2 trial evaluated nalIRI+5FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese pts with gemcitabine-refractory mPAC (NCT02697058).Table:
132P
nal-IRI+5-FU/ LV n = 40 | 5-FU/ LV n = 39 | |
---|---|---|
PFS, mo (investigator assessed) | ||
Median | 2.7 | 1.5 |
95% CI | 1.5–5.0 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.60 | |
95% CI | 0.37–0.98 | |
P-value | 0.039 | |
PFS, mo (independently assessed) | ||
Median | 1.7 | 1.6 |
95% CI | 1.5–3.6 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.79 | |
95% CI | 0.47–1.32 | |
P-value | 0.376 | |
Best overall response, n (%) | 40 (100.0) | 39 (100.0) |
ORR | 8 (20.0) | 1 (2.6) |
P-value | 0.029 | |
Disease control rate, n (%) | 8 (20.0) | 2 (5.1) |
P-value | 0.087 | |
OS, mo | ||
Median | 6.3 | NR |
95% CI | 5.2–NR | 6.1–NR |
HR | 1.67 | |
95% CI | 0.88–3.16 | |
P-value | 0.110 | |
TTF, mo | ||
Median | 1.7 | 1.5 |
95% CI | 1.5–2.2 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.70 | |
95% CI | 0.44–1.12 | |
P-value | 0.134 | |
CA19-9 response rate,n/evaluable population (%) | 5/28 (17.9) | 1/28 (3.6) |
P-value | 0.193 |
Methods
This study assessed nal-IRI+5-FU/LV tolerability as per the NAPOLI-1 dosing regimen (Part 1), and safety and efficacy (Part 2). Part 2 outcomes are reported. Pts were randomised 1:1 and stratified by KPS (70 and 80 vs ≥ 90) and baseline albumin (≥4.0 g/dL vs < 4.0 g/dL). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were ORR, DCR, OS, TTF, CA199 response and QoL. The ITT population comprised all pts randomised.
Results
Differences in pt baseline characteristics were noted in the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 40/79) vs 5FU/LV (n = 39/79) arms, e.g. hepatic lesions (63% vs 51%), stage IV disease at diagnosis (78% vs 51%), and post-study anticancer therapy (55% vs 72%). Efficacy results are shown in the table. Investigator-assessed mPFS increase with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was clinically meaningful and statistically significant vs 5-FU/LV (2.7 vs 1.5 mo, P = 0.039). Independently-assessed mPFS showed a similar trend (1.7 vs 1.6 mo, P = 0.376). mOS was 6.3 mo with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and not reached with 5-FU/LV. DCR, TTF, CA19-9 and ORR response increased, ORR significantly, with nalIRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV. The most commonly reported grade ≥3 TEAEs with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV were decreased neutrophil count (37% vs 3%), decreased white blood cell count (20% vs 0) and diarrhoea (17% vs 3%).
Conclusions
Treatment with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was associated with clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator-assessed mPFS and ORR vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese patients, with no new or unexpected safety signals in this population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02697058.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support was provided by Christopher Lamb of Physicians World Europe GmbH, Mannheim, Germany and was funded by Servier Global Medical Affairs (Suresnes, France).
Legal entity responsible for the study
Servier and the authors.
Funding
Servier.
Disclosure
T. Ioka: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. M. Kanai: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TheraBioPharma Inc. M. Ikeda: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Bayer Yakuhin; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Kyowa Hakko Kirin; Research grant / Funding (self): Yakult; Research grant / Funding (self): Eli Lilly Japan; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Baxalta Japan Limited; Research grant / Funding (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (self): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (self): Nano Carrier; Research grant / Funding (self): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Takar Bio. T. Okusaka: Honoraria (self): Meiji Seika Pharma ; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): AbbVie Inc.; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Shire; Honoraria (self): ; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; Honoraria (self): Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma K.K.; Honoraria (self): Nobelpharma Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Pfizer Japan Inc.; Honoraria (self): FUJIFILM RI Pharma Co., Ltd ; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers K.K.; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca K.K.; Research grant / Funding (self): Baxter. J. Furuse: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. Y. Komatsu: Advisory / Consultancy: Yakult; Advisory / Consultancy: Taiho; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly. S. Shimizu: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte Corporation; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): Baxalta Japan; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Yakult; Research grant / Funding (institution): IQVIA Services Japan. P. Chugh: Full / Part-time employment: Servier. R. Tang: Full / Part-time employment: Servier. M. Ueno: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Shire; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Daiichi Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoCarrier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
196P - The tolerability and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma
Presenter: Nicholas Travers
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
197TiP - GLOW: Zolbetuximab + CAPOX compared with placebo + CAPOX as first-line treatment for patients with Claudin18.2+/HER2– Locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: A randomized phase III study
Presenter: Rui-Hua Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
198TiP - SPOTLIGHT: Comparison of zolbetuximab or placebo + mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment in patients with claudin18.2+/HER2– locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ): A randomized phase III study
Presenter: Kensei Yamaguchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
199TiP - Phase III (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Thomas Yau
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
200P - Apalutamide (APA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Analysis of pain and fatigue in the TITAN study
Presenter: Byung Ha Chung
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
201P - Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Jacob See-tong Pang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
202P - What is the best first-line therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in 2019? A network meta-analysis
Presenter: Tsz Him So
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
203P - Long term outcomes of 2-weekly docetaxel in metastatic high-volume hormone sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Suhas Singla
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
204P - The effect of radium-223 therapy in agent orange related veterans with metastatic castrate resistance prostate carcinoma (CRPC)
Presenter: Andrew Liman
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
205P - Treatment pattern and outcomes of radium-223 (Ra223) in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Retrospective cohort analysis from Hong Kong
Presenter: Darren Poon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract