Abstract 132P
Background
In the NAPOLI-1 phase 3 trial, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly increased median PFS (mPFS) vs 5-FU/LV (3.1 vs 1.5 months [mo], unstratified HR = 0.56, P = 0.0001) in pts with mPAC that progressed on prior gemcitabine-based therapy. This randomised phase 2 trial evaluated nalIRI+5FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese pts with gemcitabine-refractory mPAC (NCT02697058).Table:
132P
nal-IRI+5-FU/ LV n = 40 | 5-FU/ LV n = 39 | |
---|---|---|
PFS, mo (investigator assessed) | ||
Median | 2.7 | 1.5 |
95% CI | 1.5–5.0 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.60 | |
95% CI | 0.37–0.98 | |
P-value | 0.039 | |
PFS, mo (independently assessed) | ||
Median | 1.7 | 1.6 |
95% CI | 1.5–3.6 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.79 | |
95% CI | 0.47–1.32 | |
P-value | 0.376 | |
Best overall response, n (%) | 40 (100.0) | 39 (100.0) |
ORR | 8 (20.0) | 1 (2.6) |
P-value | 0.029 | |
Disease control rate, n (%) | 8 (20.0) | 2 (5.1) |
P-value | 0.087 | |
OS, mo | ||
Median | 6.3 | NR |
95% CI | 5.2–NR | 6.1–NR |
HR | 1.67 | |
95% CI | 0.88–3.16 | |
P-value | 0.110 | |
TTF, mo | ||
Median | 1.7 | 1.5 |
95% CI | 1.5–2.2 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.70 | |
95% CI | 0.44–1.12 | |
P-value | 0.134 | |
CA19-9 response rate,n/evaluable population (%) | 5/28 (17.9) | 1/28 (3.6) |
P-value | 0.193 |
Methods
This study assessed nal-IRI+5-FU/LV tolerability as per the NAPOLI-1 dosing regimen (Part 1), and safety and efficacy (Part 2). Part 2 outcomes are reported. Pts were randomised 1:1 and stratified by KPS (70 and 80 vs ≥ 90) and baseline albumin (≥4.0 g/dL vs < 4.0 g/dL). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were ORR, DCR, OS, TTF, CA199 response and QoL. The ITT population comprised all pts randomised.
Results
Differences in pt baseline characteristics were noted in the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 40/79) vs 5FU/LV (n = 39/79) arms, e.g. hepatic lesions (63% vs 51%), stage IV disease at diagnosis (78% vs 51%), and post-study anticancer therapy (55% vs 72%). Efficacy results are shown in the table. Investigator-assessed mPFS increase with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was clinically meaningful and statistically significant vs 5-FU/LV (2.7 vs 1.5 mo, P = 0.039). Independently-assessed mPFS showed a similar trend (1.7 vs 1.6 mo, P = 0.376). mOS was 6.3 mo with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and not reached with 5-FU/LV. DCR, TTF, CA19-9 and ORR response increased, ORR significantly, with nalIRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV. The most commonly reported grade ≥3 TEAEs with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV were decreased neutrophil count (37% vs 3%), decreased white blood cell count (20% vs 0) and diarrhoea (17% vs 3%).
Conclusions
Treatment with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was associated with clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator-assessed mPFS and ORR vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese patients, with no new or unexpected safety signals in this population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02697058.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support was provided by Christopher Lamb of Physicians World Europe GmbH, Mannheim, Germany and was funded by Servier Global Medical Affairs (Suresnes, France).
Legal entity responsible for the study
Servier and the authors.
Funding
Servier.
Disclosure
T. Ioka: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. M. Kanai: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TheraBioPharma Inc. M. Ikeda: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Bayer Yakuhin; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Kyowa Hakko Kirin; Research grant / Funding (self): Yakult; Research grant / Funding (self): Eli Lilly Japan; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Baxalta Japan Limited; Research grant / Funding (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (self): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (self): Nano Carrier; Research grant / Funding (self): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Takar Bio. T. Okusaka: Honoraria (self): Meiji Seika Pharma ; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): AbbVie Inc.; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Shire; Honoraria (self): ; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; Honoraria (self): Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma K.K.; Honoraria (self): Nobelpharma Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Pfizer Japan Inc.; Honoraria (self): FUJIFILM RI Pharma Co., Ltd ; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers K.K.; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca K.K.; Research grant / Funding (self): Baxter. J. Furuse: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. Y. Komatsu: Advisory / Consultancy: Yakult; Advisory / Consultancy: Taiho; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly. S. Shimizu: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte Corporation; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): Baxalta Japan; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Yakult; Research grant / Funding (institution): IQVIA Services Japan. P. Chugh: Full / Part-time employment: Servier. R. Tang: Full / Part-time employment: Servier. M. Ueno: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Shire; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Daiichi Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoCarrier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
165P - Lenvatinib treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The relationship between efficacy and safety
Presenter: Takayoshi Oikawa
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
166P - The comparison between UGT1A1 single heterozygous and wild type regarding the clinical outcomes of fixed dose irinotecan monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: Multicenter retrospective study
Presenter: Takahide Sasaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
167P - Prognostic impact of the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in advanced pancreatic cancer treated with GEM plus nab-PTX or FOLFIRINOX: Based on the results of a multicenter retrospective study (the NAPOLEON study)
Presenter: Akitaka Makiyama
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
168P - A retrospective multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of irinotecan in patients with advanced gastric cancer: Analysis of Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS)
Presenter: Takuya Honda
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
169P - M-phase phosphoprotein 8 promotes gastric cancer growth and metastasis via p53/Bcl-2 and EMT-related signalling pathways
Presenter: Yizhuo Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
170P - Surgery alone versus surgery combined with Chemotherapy: Survival patterns among patients with fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Yasmine Ashraf
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
171P - The clinical value of prognostic nutritional index in patients with anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy
Presenter: Yan Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
172P - Preoperative neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts recurrence after surgery in patient with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN)
Presenter: Takayuki Miura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
173P - Cancer stem-like phenotypes including immune surveillance and its responsible genes in induced liver cancer stem-like cells
Presenter: Ryouichi Tsunedomi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
174P - Progression of computer aided diagnosis on gastric cancer
Presenter: Yingyan Yu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract