Abstract 132P
Background
In the NAPOLI-1 phase 3 trial, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly increased median PFS (mPFS) vs 5-FU/LV (3.1 vs 1.5 months [mo], unstratified HR = 0.56, P = 0.0001) in pts with mPAC that progressed on prior gemcitabine-based therapy. This randomised phase 2 trial evaluated nalIRI+5FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese pts with gemcitabine-refractory mPAC (NCT02697058).Table:
132P
nal-IRI+5-FU/ LV n = 40 | 5-FU/ LV n = 39 | |
---|---|---|
PFS, mo (investigator assessed) | ||
Median | 2.7 | 1.5 |
95% CI | 1.5–5.0 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.60 | |
95% CI | 0.37–0.98 | |
P-value | 0.039 | |
PFS, mo (independently assessed) | ||
Median | 1.7 | 1.6 |
95% CI | 1.5–3.6 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.79 | |
95% CI | 0.47–1.32 | |
P-value | 0.376 | |
Best overall response, n (%) | 40 (100.0) | 39 (100.0) |
ORR | 8 (20.0) | 1 (2.6) |
P-value | 0.029 | |
Disease control rate, n (%) | 8 (20.0) | 2 (5.1) |
P-value | 0.087 | |
OS, mo | ||
Median | 6.3 | NR |
95% CI | 5.2–NR | 6.1–NR |
HR | 1.67 | |
95% CI | 0.88–3.16 | |
P-value | 0.110 | |
TTF, mo | ||
Median | 1.7 | 1.5 |
95% CI | 1.5–2.2 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.70 | |
95% CI | 0.44–1.12 | |
P-value | 0.134 | |
CA19-9 response rate,n/evaluable population (%) | 5/28 (17.9) | 1/28 (3.6) |
P-value | 0.193 |
Methods
This study assessed nal-IRI+5-FU/LV tolerability as per the NAPOLI-1 dosing regimen (Part 1), and safety and efficacy (Part 2). Part 2 outcomes are reported. Pts were randomised 1:1 and stratified by KPS (70 and 80 vs ≥ 90) and baseline albumin (≥4.0 g/dL vs < 4.0 g/dL). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were ORR, DCR, OS, TTF, CA199 response and QoL. The ITT population comprised all pts randomised.
Results
Differences in pt baseline characteristics were noted in the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 40/79) vs 5FU/LV (n = 39/79) arms, e.g. hepatic lesions (63% vs 51%), stage IV disease at diagnosis (78% vs 51%), and post-study anticancer therapy (55% vs 72%). Efficacy results are shown in the table. Investigator-assessed mPFS increase with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was clinically meaningful and statistically significant vs 5-FU/LV (2.7 vs 1.5 mo, P = 0.039). Independently-assessed mPFS showed a similar trend (1.7 vs 1.6 mo, P = 0.376). mOS was 6.3 mo with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and not reached with 5-FU/LV. DCR, TTF, CA19-9 and ORR response increased, ORR significantly, with nalIRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV. The most commonly reported grade ≥3 TEAEs with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV were decreased neutrophil count (37% vs 3%), decreased white blood cell count (20% vs 0) and diarrhoea (17% vs 3%).
Conclusions
Treatment with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was associated with clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator-assessed mPFS and ORR vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese patients, with no new or unexpected safety signals in this population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02697058.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support was provided by Christopher Lamb of Physicians World Europe GmbH, Mannheim, Germany and was funded by Servier Global Medical Affairs (Suresnes, France).
Legal entity responsible for the study
Servier and the authors.
Funding
Servier.
Disclosure
T. Ioka: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. M. Kanai: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TheraBioPharma Inc. M. Ikeda: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Bayer Yakuhin; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Kyowa Hakko Kirin; Research grant / Funding (self): Yakult; Research grant / Funding (self): Eli Lilly Japan; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Baxalta Japan Limited; Research grant / Funding (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (self): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (self): Nano Carrier; Research grant / Funding (self): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Takar Bio. T. Okusaka: Honoraria (self): Meiji Seika Pharma ; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): AbbVie Inc.; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Shire; Honoraria (self): ; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; Honoraria (self): Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma K.K.; Honoraria (self): Nobelpharma Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Pfizer Japan Inc.; Honoraria (self): FUJIFILM RI Pharma Co., Ltd ; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers K.K.; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca K.K.; Research grant / Funding (self): Baxter. J. Furuse: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. Y. Komatsu: Advisory / Consultancy: Yakult; Advisory / Consultancy: Taiho; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly. S. Shimizu: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte Corporation; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): Baxalta Japan; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Yakult; Research grant / Funding (institution): IQVIA Services Japan. P. Chugh: Full / Part-time employment: Servier. R. Tang: Full / Part-time employment: Servier. M. Ueno: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Shire; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Daiichi Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoCarrier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
238P - Laparoscopic cytoreduction in low disease burden, advanced-stage ovarian cancers: Experience from a tertiary cancer center
Presenter: Vikas Gupta
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
239P - Impact of counseling on patient reported sexual adjustment following chemoradiation and brachytherapy for cervical cancer
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
240P - Morbidity and mortality of cervical cancer in the Republic of Kazakhstan
Presenter: Almagul Zhabagina
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
241P - Impact of genomic alterations and HPV genotypes on clinical outcomes of Japanese patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
Presenter: Ikumi Kuno
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
242P - Impact of combined interstitial and intracavitary brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A survival and toxicity profile assessment
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
243P - Cervical cancer screening in sub-urban area of Banten and factor associated with uptake of screening
Presenter: Prio Wibisono
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
245P - Factors influencing adherence to cryotherapy following positive VIA result as cervical cancer prevention in Temanggung, Central Java, Indonesia
Presenter: Herindita Puspitaningtyas
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
246P - The main of reasons of advanced stage cervical cancer in Uzbekistan
Presenter: Zakhirova Nargiza
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
247P - Role of ADC values in assessing response after chemoradiotherapy in cervix cancer and in identifying residual disease
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
248P - Retrospective review of metastatic carcinoma of cervix from a tertiary cancer institute of south India
Presenter: Arkoprovo Halder
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract