Abstract 487P
Background
Afatinib is an irreversible second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) while gefitinib or erlotinib are reversible first-generation EGFR-TKIs.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients with EGFR mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line afatinib versus gefitinib or erlotinib at University Malaya Medical Centre from 1st January 2015 to 31th December 2018.
Results
Of 113 patients, 24 (21.2%) received afatinib, 63 (55.8%) received gefitinib and 26 (23.0%) received erlotinib in first-line setting. Their demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in the table. Afatinib was used significantly more frequently in patients with rare or complex EGFR mutations (p = 0.005), and more often in patients with symptomatic brain metastases. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of patients treated with afatinib (13.1 months) was longer than that of patients treated with gefitinib (10.9 months) or erlotinib (7.8 months) (p = 0.479). Patients receiving afatinib had consistently longer PFS than patients receiving gefitinib for the first 17 months and erlotinib for the first 20 months. The overall response rate was higher in patients on afatinib (75.0%) than those on gefitinib (63.5%) or erlotinib (53.8%). There was no difference in the disease control rate. Three patients (2.7%) had severe side-effects while on EGFR-TKI. Of two patients on afatinib, one had grade-3 diarrhea while another had grade 3 stomatitis, rash and paronychia. One patient had grade 3 rash on gefitinib.Table:
487P Clinical characteristic of 113 patients on first-line EGFR-TKI
Characteristics, No (%) | Afatinib (24) | Gefitinib (63) | Erlotinib (26) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symp brain mets | No Yes | 17 (70.8) 7 (29.2) | 53 (84.1) 10 (15.9) | 22 (84.6) 4 (15.4) | 0.181 |
EGFR subtype | 19 del 21 L858R Rare/complex | 16 (66.7) 2 (8.3) 6 (25.0) | 39 (61.9) 20 (31.7) 4 (6.3) | 22 (84.6) 3 (11.5) 1 (3.8) | 0.005 |
Side-effect | grade 1-2 grade 3 | 22 (91.7) 2 (8.3) | 62 (98.4) 1 (1.6) | 26 (100) 0 | 0.007 |
Objective response | Yes No | 18 (75.0) 6 (25.0) | 40 (63.5) 23 (36.5) | 14 (53.8) 12 (46.2) | 0.298 |
Disease control | Yes No | 23 (95.8) 1 (4.2) | 59 (93.7) 4 (6.3) | 24 (92.3) 2 (7.7) | 0.872 |
Median PFS | Months Event, No. (%) | 13.1 19 (79.2) | 10.9 49 (77.8) | 7.8 19 (73.1) | 0.479 |
Conclusions
Patients receiving first-line afatinib demonstrated longer mPFS than those on first-line gefitinib or erlotinib. The lack of statistical significance in this study is because of the small number of patients treated with afatinib, more frequent rare or complex EGFR mutations and more symptomatic brain metastases among afatinib treated patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
220P - An outcome analysis of robotassisted radical nephroureterectomy with extended template lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Ashwin Tamhankar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
221P - Comparative analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy for cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective real-world evidence
Presenter: Hsiang‐Lan Lai
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
222P - Does tumor grade really improve the prognostic ability of the staging system for men with penile cancer: A SEER database analysis
Presenter: Ravi Kanodia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
223TiP - EV-301: A phase III trial in progress evaluating enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
230P - Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) and newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC): SOLO1 China cohort
Presenter: Lingying Wu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
231P - Cost-effectiveness of olaparib vs routine surveillance in the maintenance setting for patients with BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in Singapore
Presenter: David SP Tan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
233P - Incorporation of correlative studies in ovarian cancers in the era of precision medicine: Assessment of accountability and utility
Presenter: Nadia Hitchen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
234P - Implementation of mainstream BRCA testing in epithelial ovarian cancer in a tertiary centre
Presenter: Edbert Wong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
235P - The efficacy of radiation therapy in ovarian carcinoma: A propensity score analysis of a population-based study
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
236P - Front-line maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: What’s next PARP inhibitors?
Presenter: Han Gong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract