Abstract 487P
Background
Afatinib is an irreversible second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) while gefitinib or erlotinib are reversible first-generation EGFR-TKIs.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients with EGFR mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line afatinib versus gefitinib or erlotinib at University Malaya Medical Centre from 1st January 2015 to 31th December 2018.
Results
Of 113 patients, 24 (21.2%) received afatinib, 63 (55.8%) received gefitinib and 26 (23.0%) received erlotinib in first-line setting. Their demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in the table. Afatinib was used significantly more frequently in patients with rare or complex EGFR mutations (p = 0.005), and more often in patients with symptomatic brain metastases. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of patients treated with afatinib (13.1 months) was longer than that of patients treated with gefitinib (10.9 months) or erlotinib (7.8 months) (p = 0.479). Patients receiving afatinib had consistently longer PFS than patients receiving gefitinib for the first 17 months and erlotinib for the first 20 months. The overall response rate was higher in patients on afatinib (75.0%) than those on gefitinib (63.5%) or erlotinib (53.8%). There was no difference in the disease control rate. Three patients (2.7%) had severe side-effects while on EGFR-TKI. Of two patients on afatinib, one had grade-3 diarrhea while another had grade 3 stomatitis, rash and paronychia. One patient had grade 3 rash on gefitinib.Table:
487P Clinical characteristic of 113 patients on first-line EGFR-TKI
Characteristics, No (%) | Afatinib (24) | Gefitinib (63) | Erlotinib (26) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symp brain mets | No Yes | 17 (70.8) 7 (29.2) | 53 (84.1) 10 (15.9) | 22 (84.6) 4 (15.4) | 0.181 |
EGFR subtype | 19 del 21 L858R Rare/complex | 16 (66.7) 2 (8.3) 6 (25.0) | 39 (61.9) 20 (31.7) 4 (6.3) | 22 (84.6) 3 (11.5) 1 (3.8) | 0.005 |
Side-effect | grade 1-2 grade 3 | 22 (91.7) 2 (8.3) | 62 (98.4) 1 (1.6) | 26 (100) 0 | 0.007 |
Objective response | Yes No | 18 (75.0) 6 (25.0) | 40 (63.5) 23 (36.5) | 14 (53.8) 12 (46.2) | 0.298 |
Disease control | Yes No | 23 (95.8) 1 (4.2) | 59 (93.7) 4 (6.3) | 24 (92.3) 2 (7.7) | 0.872 |
Median PFS | Months Event, No. (%) | 13.1 19 (79.2) | 10.9 49 (77.8) | 7.8 19 (73.1) | 0.479 |
Conclusions
Patients receiving first-line afatinib demonstrated longer mPFS than those on first-line gefitinib or erlotinib. The lack of statistical significance in this study is because of the small number of patients treated with afatinib, more frequent rare or complex EGFR mutations and more symptomatic brain metastases among afatinib treated patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
237P - PARP inhibitor in platinum resistant ovarian cancer: Single center real world experience
Presenter: Saphalta Baghmar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
238P - Laparoscopic cytoreduction in low disease burden, advanced-stage ovarian cancers: Experience from a tertiary cancer center
Presenter: Vikas Gupta
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
239P - Impact of counseling on patient reported sexual adjustment following chemoradiation and brachytherapy for cervical cancer
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
240P - Morbidity and mortality of cervical cancer in the Republic of Kazakhstan
Presenter: Almagul Zhabagina
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
241P - Impact of genomic alterations and HPV genotypes on clinical outcomes of Japanese patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
Presenter: Ikumi Kuno
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
242P - Impact of combined interstitial and intracavitary brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A survival and toxicity profile assessment
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
243P - Cervical cancer screening in sub-urban area of Banten and factor associated with uptake of screening
Presenter: Prio Wibisono
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
245P - Factors influencing adherence to cryotherapy following positive VIA result as cervical cancer prevention in Temanggung, Central Java, Indonesia
Presenter: Herindita Puspitaningtyas
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
246P - The main of reasons of advanced stage cervical cancer in Uzbekistan
Presenter: Zakhirova Nargiza
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
247P - Role of ADC values in assessing response after chemoradiotherapy in cervix cancer and in identifying residual disease
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract