Abstract 487P
Background
Afatinib is an irreversible second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) while gefitinib or erlotinib are reversible first-generation EGFR-TKIs.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients with EGFR mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line afatinib versus gefitinib or erlotinib at University Malaya Medical Centre from 1st January 2015 to 31th December 2018.
Results
Of 113 patients, 24 (21.2%) received afatinib, 63 (55.8%) received gefitinib and 26 (23.0%) received erlotinib in first-line setting. Their demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in the table. Afatinib was used significantly more frequently in patients with rare or complex EGFR mutations (p = 0.005), and more often in patients with symptomatic brain metastases. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of patients treated with afatinib (13.1 months) was longer than that of patients treated with gefitinib (10.9 months) or erlotinib (7.8 months) (p = 0.479). Patients receiving afatinib had consistently longer PFS than patients receiving gefitinib for the first 17 months and erlotinib for the first 20 months. The overall response rate was higher in patients on afatinib (75.0%) than those on gefitinib (63.5%) or erlotinib (53.8%). There was no difference in the disease control rate. Three patients (2.7%) had severe side-effects while on EGFR-TKI. Of two patients on afatinib, one had grade-3 diarrhea while another had grade 3 stomatitis, rash and paronychia. One patient had grade 3 rash on gefitinib.Table:
487P Clinical characteristic of 113 patients on first-line EGFR-TKI
Characteristics, No (%) | Afatinib (24) | Gefitinib (63) | Erlotinib (26) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symp brain mets | No Yes | 17 (70.8) 7 (29.2) | 53 (84.1) 10 (15.9) | 22 (84.6) 4 (15.4) | 0.181 |
EGFR subtype | 19 del 21 L858R Rare/complex | 16 (66.7) 2 (8.3) 6 (25.0) | 39 (61.9) 20 (31.7) 4 (6.3) | 22 (84.6) 3 (11.5) 1 (3.8) | 0.005 |
Side-effect | grade 1-2 grade 3 | 22 (91.7) 2 (8.3) | 62 (98.4) 1 (1.6) | 26 (100) 0 | 0.007 |
Objective response | Yes No | 18 (75.0) 6 (25.0) | 40 (63.5) 23 (36.5) | 14 (53.8) 12 (46.2) | 0.298 |
Disease control | Yes No | 23 (95.8) 1 (4.2) | 59 (93.7) 4 (6.3) | 24 (92.3) 2 (7.7) | 0.872 |
Median PFS | Months Event, No. (%) | 13.1 19 (79.2) | 10.9 49 (77.8) | 7.8 19 (73.1) | 0.479 |
Conclusions
Patients receiving first-line afatinib demonstrated longer mPFS than those on first-line gefitinib or erlotinib. The lack of statistical significance in this study is because of the small number of patients treated with afatinib, more frequent rare or complex EGFR mutations and more symptomatic brain metastases among afatinib treated patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
164P - Multi-centered phase II trial of weekly 5-FU plus l-LV regimen as salvage line chemotherapy for oral fluorouracil resistant advanced gastric cancer (HGCSG1502)
Presenter: Yusuke Sasaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
165P - Lenvatinib treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The relationship between efficacy and safety
Presenter: Takayoshi Oikawa
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
166P - The comparison between UGT1A1 single heterozygous and wild type regarding the clinical outcomes of fixed dose irinotecan monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: Multicenter retrospective study
Presenter: Takahide Sasaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
167P - Prognostic impact of the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in advanced pancreatic cancer treated with GEM plus nab-PTX or FOLFIRINOX: Based on the results of a multicenter retrospective study (the NAPOLEON study)
Presenter: Akitaka Makiyama
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
168P - A retrospective multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of irinotecan in patients with advanced gastric cancer: Analysis of Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS)
Presenter: Takuya Honda
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
169P - M-phase phosphoprotein 8 promotes gastric cancer growth and metastasis via p53/Bcl-2 and EMT-related signalling pathways
Presenter: Yizhuo Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
170P - Surgery alone versus surgery combined with Chemotherapy: Survival patterns among patients with fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Yasmine Ashraf
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
171P - The clinical value of prognostic nutritional index in patients with anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy
Presenter: Yan Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
172P - Preoperative neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts recurrence after surgery in patient with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN)
Presenter: Takayuki Miura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
173P - Cancer stem-like phenotypes including immune surveillance and its responsible genes in induced liver cancer stem-like cells
Presenter: Ryouichi Tsunedomi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract