Abstract 251P
Background
Uterine leiomyoma (UL) is the most common female pelvic benign tumor with recurrence rates of 16.7%-52.8%. We aimed to propose a prognostic index (PI) model for predicting the long-term (>5 years) risk of UL recurrence.
Methods
Women aged 18–44 years who initially underwent myomectomy for UL at one of the three study hospitals between April 2012 and October 2013 were enrolled. The data collected included patients’ demographics, leiomyomas’ characteristics, relapses, subsequent contraceptive methods, and postoperative gravidity and parity. A PI model was proposed based on the β-coefficients in the results of multivariate Cox regression analysis in prediction model group. The differences among the PI-based risk groups were tested by Kaplan–Meier analysis (using paired log-rank test) and univariate Cox regression analysis (using the Forward: LR) in prediction model, internal validation and external validation group.
Results
There were 725 patients included in this study. PI formula =1.5(if 3-5 leiomyomas)+2(if > 5 leiomyomas)+1(if residue)+1(if not submucosal)+1(if combined endometriosis). The PI value (0-5) was divided into low-risk group, intermediate-risk group, and high-risk group by cut-off values 1.25 and 3.75. In the prediction model group, the high-risk group had a significantly 4.55 times greater recurrence risk of UL than that in the low-risk group [cumulative recurrence rate (CR): 82.1% vs 29.5%, HR = 4.55, 95% CI; 2.821-7.339]; the intermediate-risk group had a significantly 2.81 times greater recurrence risk of UL than that in the low-risk group (CR: 62.3% vs 29.5%, HR = 2.81, 95% CI; 2.035-3.878). The differences between any two risk groups were also statistically significant (P < 0.05) in both internal and external validation groups.
Conclusions
The PI model was proved to be effective in distinguishing low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups for long-term recurrence of UL after initial myomectomy in women aged 18-44 years, allowing it to be an objective tool aid in clinical decision making. In the future, prospective researches should be carried out to confirm the predictive ability of this PI model, and its practical value in clinical decision making.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zheng Yu Li.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
51P - Enhancing the anti-breast tumour activity of STING through a novel sting transcriptional regulator
Presenter: Hanchu Xiong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
52P - Reverse Warburg effect-related mitochondrial activity and 18F-FDG uptake in invasive ductal carcinoma
Presenter: Byung Wook Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
53P - Phase II study of atorvastatin in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma (ART): Final analysis report
Presenter: Abdullah Altwairgi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
54P - Association between Parkinson’s disease and brain tumours: A nationwide population-based cohort study
Presenter: Joo-hyun Park
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
55P - Toxicity profiles of treatment with modern fractionated radiotherapy, contemporary stereotactic radiosurgery, or transsphenoidal surgery in non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma
Presenter: Kevin Sheng-Po Yuan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
56P - Hippocampal avoidance in WBRT for metastases: Comparative neurocognitive and dosimetric assessment
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
57P - Multidisciplinary brain metastasis clinic: Is it effective and worthwhile?
Presenter: Annu Rajpurohit
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
58P - Functional status as a determinant prognostic factor for overall survival in adult patients with medulloblastoma treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy
Presenter: Juan Ayala Alvarez
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
59P - Pattern of care in high-grade gliomas after recurrence
Presenter: Nandini Menon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
60P - Five fractions plus “SRS” boost combined with temozolamide for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
Presenter: Azhar Rashid
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract