Abstract 251P
Background
Uterine leiomyoma (UL) is the most common female pelvic benign tumor with recurrence rates of 16.7%-52.8%. We aimed to propose a prognostic index (PI) model for predicting the long-term (>5 years) risk of UL recurrence.
Methods
Women aged 18–44 years who initially underwent myomectomy for UL at one of the three study hospitals between April 2012 and October 2013 were enrolled. The data collected included patients’ demographics, leiomyomas’ characteristics, relapses, subsequent contraceptive methods, and postoperative gravidity and parity. A PI model was proposed based on the β-coefficients in the results of multivariate Cox regression analysis in prediction model group. The differences among the PI-based risk groups were tested by Kaplan–Meier analysis (using paired log-rank test) and univariate Cox regression analysis (using the Forward: LR) in prediction model, internal validation and external validation group.
Results
There were 725 patients included in this study. PI formula =1.5(if 3-5 leiomyomas)+2(if > 5 leiomyomas)+1(if residue)+1(if not submucosal)+1(if combined endometriosis). The PI value (0-5) was divided into low-risk group, intermediate-risk group, and high-risk group by cut-off values 1.25 and 3.75. In the prediction model group, the high-risk group had a significantly 4.55 times greater recurrence risk of UL than that in the low-risk group [cumulative recurrence rate (CR): 82.1% vs 29.5%, HR = 4.55, 95% CI; 2.821-7.339]; the intermediate-risk group had a significantly 2.81 times greater recurrence risk of UL than that in the low-risk group (CR: 62.3% vs 29.5%, HR = 2.81, 95% CI; 2.035-3.878). The differences between any two risk groups were also statistically significant (P < 0.05) in both internal and external validation groups.
Conclusions
The PI model was proved to be effective in distinguishing low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups for long-term recurrence of UL after initial myomectomy in women aged 18-44 years, allowing it to be an objective tool aid in clinical decision making. In the future, prospective researches should be carried out to confirm the predictive ability of this PI model, and its practical value in clinical decision making.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zheng Yu Li.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
9P - XRCC1 Arg194Trp, Palb2 T1100T (3300T>G), HMMR V353A, TNF aG308A polymorphisms as diagnostic and prognostic markers of breast cancer in the Kyrgyz ethnic group
Presenter: Aigul Semetei kyzy
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
232P - Early Results from the Phase I Study of SY-1365, a Potent and Selective CDK7 inhibitor, in Patients with Ovarian Cancer and Advanced Solid Tumors
Presenter: Debra Richardson
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
382P - Drug metabolizing enzymes pharmacogenomic: Biomarkers for improved chemotherapy in head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Sunishtha Bhatia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
401P - Women in oncology: Alarming figures from India
Presenter: Sharada Mailankody
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
416P - Multidisciplinary management of sarcomas of the head and neck: An institutional experience
Presenter: Kavitha Jain
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
523P - Co-morbilities and survival of patients initially diagnosed with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Impact of hypertension, diabetes and chronic hepatitis B viral infection
Presenter: Weigang Xiu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
529P - Osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and asymptomatic brain metastases: An open-label, two-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Roni Gillis
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract