Abstract 251P
Background
Uterine leiomyoma (UL) is the most common female pelvic benign tumor with recurrence rates of 16.7%-52.8%. We aimed to propose a prognostic index (PI) model for predicting the long-term (>5 years) risk of UL recurrence.
Methods
Women aged 18–44 years who initially underwent myomectomy for UL at one of the three study hospitals between April 2012 and October 2013 were enrolled. The data collected included patients’ demographics, leiomyomas’ characteristics, relapses, subsequent contraceptive methods, and postoperative gravidity and parity. A PI model was proposed based on the β-coefficients in the results of multivariate Cox regression analysis in prediction model group. The differences among the PI-based risk groups were tested by Kaplan–Meier analysis (using paired log-rank test) and univariate Cox regression analysis (using the Forward: LR) in prediction model, internal validation and external validation group.
Results
There were 725 patients included in this study. PI formula =1.5(if 3-5 leiomyomas)+2(if > 5 leiomyomas)+1(if residue)+1(if not submucosal)+1(if combined endometriosis). The PI value (0-5) was divided into low-risk group, intermediate-risk group, and high-risk group by cut-off values 1.25 and 3.75. In the prediction model group, the high-risk group had a significantly 4.55 times greater recurrence risk of UL than that in the low-risk group [cumulative recurrence rate (CR): 82.1% vs 29.5%, HR = 4.55, 95% CI; 2.821-7.339]; the intermediate-risk group had a significantly 2.81 times greater recurrence risk of UL than that in the low-risk group (CR: 62.3% vs 29.5%, HR = 2.81, 95% CI; 2.035-3.878). The differences between any two risk groups were also statistically significant (P < 0.05) in both internal and external validation groups.
Conclusions
The PI model was proved to be effective in distinguishing low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups for long-term recurrence of UL after initial myomectomy in women aged 18-44 years, allowing it to be an objective tool aid in clinical decision making. In the future, prospective researches should be carried out to confirm the predictive ability of this PI model, and its practical value in clinical decision making.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zheng Yu Li.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
74TiP - Phase I study of BI 836880, a VEGF/Ang2-blocking nanobody®, as monotherapy and in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Kentaro Yamazaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
75P - A parallel deep learning network framework for whole-body bone scan image analysis
Presenter: Xiaorong Pu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
76P - Perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials
Presenter: Jukyung Jeon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
77P - A prognostic nomogram for the prediction of neuroblastoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
80P - The clinical usefulness of a new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes from surgically resected specimen in colorectal cancer: Prospective randomized study
Presenter: Shiki Fujino
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Concurrent or consolidation chemotherapy during radiation as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis from two prospective study
Presenter: JianWei Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
82P - Body mass index, tumour location, and colorectal cancer survival
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
83P - Helicobacter bilis may play a role in the carcinogenesis of colitis associated colon cancer correlating to increased number of CD4+CD45RB+ T cells
Presenter: Xiangsheng Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
84P - Comprehensive evaluation of relapse risk (CERR) score for colorectal liver metastases development and validation
Presenter: Jianmin Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
85P - Which is the best partner for capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer? A retrospective analysis of a comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract