Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

59P - Pattern of care in high-grade gliomas after recurrence


23 Nov 2019


Poster display session


Tumour Site

Central Nervous System Malignancies


Nandini Menon


Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix20-ix21. 10.1093/annonc/mdz419


N.S. Menon1, V. Simha1, A. Abhyankar2, D. Kalra1, R. Krishnatry3, T. Gupta3, R. Jalali3, V.M. Patil4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, 400012 - Mumbai/IN
  • 2 Medicine, J J Hospital, 400012 - Mumbai/IN
  • 3 Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, 400012 - Mumbai/IN
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, 400068 - Mumbai/IN


Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 59P


Relapse or progression in glioblastoma is common. Multiple options ranging from local treatment like re-surgery, re-radiation to systemic therapies like bevacizumab, CCNU, etc. are available. Patients with longer progression-free interval (> 2 years), smaller volume of disease and disease in non-eloquent areas are preferably selected for local therapies and while the others receive systemic therapy. There is limited data available on the pattern of care in relapsed gliomas hence we conducted an audit to address this deficiency.


A prospective database of all glioma patients has been maintained from June 2015 onwards at neuro-oncology DMG (Disease Management Group) at the Tata Memorial Hospital. We analysed the data of patients with relapsed gliomas treated from June 2015 to December 2017.


The database had 854 patients of which 749 (87.7%) had disease progression. The treatment received by these 749 patients were best supportive care in 519 (69.3%), local therapy with or without systemic therapy in 85 (11.3%) and systemic therapy in 145 (19.4%) patients. Local therapy consisted of re-surgery (with or without re-radiation) in 63 patients and re-radiation (with or without systemic therapy) in 23 patients. The systemic therapies received were salvage temozolomide in 79 patients, bevacizumab (with or without an additional agent) in 41 patients and CCNU in 25 patients. The factors associated with administration of therapy at relapse were age (p = 0.009) and family income (0.041). The other factors tested were gender (p = 0.311) and performance status at relapse (p = 0.637).


This data highlights that a large number of patients with recurrent gliomas do not receive any treatment (69%), which is similar to the pattern of care reported from Australia. The pessimism associated with treatment of relapsed glioma is due to dismal prognosis at relapse with the current therapy available.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Tata Memorial Hospital.


Has not received any funding.


All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.