Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini Oral session 2

136MO - Predictors of multidisciplinary tumor board adherence in stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients from a large multicenter study

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Mini Oral session 2

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Immunotherapy;  Radiation Oncology;  Surgical Oncology

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Markus Joerger

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S98-S120. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

M. Joerger1, K. Koster2, S. Yohasenan3, A.S. Pakmak3, M.T. Mark4, I. Metaxas5, C. Lips6, F. Hitz1, P. Leskow3, C. Ludwig3, P. Putora1, M. Glatzer3, T. Schneider3, C. Caviezel7, T. mader8, M. Mousavi9, M. Blum10, M. Frueh11

Author affiliations

  • 1 Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen/CH
  • 2 The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton/GB
  • 3 KSSG, St.Gallen/CH
  • 4 Kantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur/CH
  • 5 Spital Thurgau AG - Kantonsspital Muensterlingen, Muensterlingen/CH
  • 6 Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 14165 - St. Gallen/CH
  • 7 KSGR - Kantonsspital Graubünden, 7000 - Chur/CH
  • 8 KSGR - Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur/CH
  • 9 KrebsregisterOstschweiz, St.Gallen/CH
  • 10 Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St.Gallen/CH
  • 11 Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen/CH

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 136MO

Background

While formalized treatment recommendations for NSCLC by a multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) has been associated with improved patient care, there is no data on the prognostic impact of individual adherence to initial MDT treatment recommendations in patients (pts) with stage III NSCLC.

Methods

Multimodal treatment data for stage III (UICC/AJCC 8th TNM staging edition) NSCLC pts between 2014 and 2020 were collected from 3 Swiss referral centers. All pts underwent MDT before treatment. MDTadherence was defined as implementation of initially recommended treatment including surgery, radiotherapy (RT), systemic treatment including sequence and intensity. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were subjected to Kaplan-Meier analysis. MDT adherence was subjected to multivariable Cox regression analysis including established prognostic factors.

Results

Adherence to initial MDT recommendations was found in 385/547 (70.4%) eligible pts. Treatment de-escalation was the prominent feature in 109/162 (67.3%) non-MDT-adherent pts, including inoperability after upfront chemotherapy (34.6%) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (15.4%) and inability to apply curative RT (17.3%). This resulted in 89/547 (16.3%) pts receiving non-curative treatment. Pts ≥65 years of age had an increased risk for MDT non-adherence (32.8% vs 23.0%, p=0.02), as had pts with a higher tumor stage (19.8% for IIIA, 38.5% for IIIB, 43.3% for IIIC, p < 0.001) and frail (ECOG ≥2) pts (53.7% vs 22.8%, p < 0.001). Median EFS was higher in MDT adherent pts (11.9 months vs 8.6 months (mo), p=0.003), as was OS (20.3 mo vs 9.4 mo, p < 0.001). OS was 20.6mo in stage IIIA, 14.9 mo in stage IIIB and 9.8 mo in stage IIIC. MDT non-adherence was an independent risk factor for EFS (hazard ratio (HR)=1.22, p=0.05). MDT non-adherence (HR=1.67, p < 0.001), disease stage (HR=1.24, p=0.02) and patient frailty (HR=1.59, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for OS.

Conclusions

One third of stage III NSCLC pts is unable to adhere to initial MDT recommendations even in tertiary referral centers. Non-adherence was associated with worse outcome, and was most prominent in elderly and frail pts. Treatment strategies for vulnerable pts should critically be reviewed.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

M. Joerger: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Clinical study activity: Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Immunophotonics, Innomedica, MSD, Novartis, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Clinical study activity: Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Anaveon; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Debiopharm, MSD, Roche, Sanofi. M.T. Mark: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: BMS. I. Metaxas: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, PharmaMar, Roche, Merck, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Travel expenses: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: PharmaMar. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.