Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini Oral session 2

135MO - Grading system of spread through air spaces is an independent predictor of recurrence in stage I invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Mini Oral session 2

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Joonseok Lee

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S98-S120. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

J. Lee1, S. Cho1, J. Chung1, J.W. Son1, E. Lee2, B.C. Shih1, W. Jung1, J.H. Jeon1, K. Kim1, S. Jheon1

Author affiliations

  • 1 SNUBH - Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam/KR
  • 2 KNU - Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu/KR

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 135MO

Background

We evaluate the prognostic impact of the spread through air spaces (STAS) grading system in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

Methods

We included patients who underwent lobectomy with lymphadenectomy and were diagnosed with stage I invasive nonmucinous LUAD. The extent of STAS was graded according to the distance from the edge of the tumor (Grade I:

Results

Among the 1660 patients, 375 (22.6%) were STAS grade I and 202 (12.2%) were STAS grade II. The STAS grade II group showed a higher proportion of pathologic stage IB (25.9% versus 38.3%, P=0.003) and micropapillary-solid predominant subtypes (18.4% versus 37.3%, P < 0.001) compared to the STAS grade I group. The median follow-up period was 59.5 months (inter-quantile range, 36.7–83.2 months). The 5-year cumulative incidence of any recurrence was 3.9% in the STAS (-) group, 8.4% in the STAS grade I group, and 17.0% in the STAS grade II group (P < 0.001). Multivariable competing risk regression analyses revealed that the STAS grading system was associated with an increased risk of any recurrence (STAS grade I, HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.66–1.78, P=0.76; STAS grade II, HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.10–3.42, P=0.022). In subgroup analysis stratified by pathologic stage, the cumulative incidence of any recurrence in the pathologic stage IA STAS grade II subgroup was comparable to that of the pathologic stage IB subgroup (IA, STAS grade II: 13.0%; IB, total: 16.0%; P value=0.8).

Table 135MO
HR95% CIP value
Age, years1.010.98–1.030.66
Sex, male0.640.33–1.250.19
Smoking, yes2.141.09–4.190.026
ECOG, ≥21.620.91–2.860.1
Predominant subtypes
Acinar-Papillary4.070.55–30.20.17
Micropapillary-Solid6.510.83–51.00.075
Invasive tumor size, cm1.391.06–1.820.016
VPI, present2.041.25–3.320.004
LVI, present1.71.08–2.660.022
Necrosis, present1.450.87–2.440.15
STAS grade
Grade I1.080.66–1.780.76
Grade II1.941.10–3.420.022

Conclusions

The STAS grading system might be associated with an increased risk of recurrence in patients with pathologic stage IA LUAD who underwent lobectomy, but not those with pathologic stage IB. The STAS grade II in pathologic stage IA LUAD demonstrated a similar risk of recurrence to that of pathologic stage IB.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.