Abstract 1568O
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed treatment of a variety of different cancer types. Published patient-reported quality of life (QOL) data have been largely limited to phase III trials. The size and heterogeneity of this literature can make patient education about ICIs difficult. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantitatively summarize change QOL in patients receiving ICI for cancer.
Methods
Two meta-analyses were conducted on publications of PD-1/PD-L1 and/or CTLA-4 inhibitors that provided mean-level QOL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and/or EQ-5D. One meta-analysis examined change in QOL in patients treated with ICIs from pre-treatment to follow-up approximately 12-24 weeks later. The second meta-analysis compared QOL at follow-up in ICI versus non-ICI regimens in randomized trials. Moderator analyses examined ICI regimen, comparator regimen, disease site, age, gender, follow-up period, and risk of bias.
Results
Of 20,323 publications identified, 26 met inclusion criteria. The first meta-analysis, encompassing 26 studies and 6,965 patients, indicated QOL did not change over time in patients treated with ICIs (P > .05). Significant moderators included ICI regimen, cancer type, sex, and risk of bias (P values <.05). In the second meta-analysis of 16 studies and 6,536 patients (ICI n=3,588, non-ICI n=2,948), better QOL was observed in ICI versus non-ICI regimens (P < .05). Significant moderators included ICI regimen, cancer type, age, and risk of bias (P values <.05).
Conclusions
This study is among the first to quantitatively summarize QOL in patients treated with ICIs. Findings suggest ICI recipients report overall stable QOL and better QOL than patients treated with non-ICI regimens. Results confirm that despite immune-related toxicities, ICIs are generally well-tolerated.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Cancer Institute grant K01 CA211789 (PI: Gonzalez).
Disclosure
B.D. Gonzalez: Advisory/Consultancy: Elly Health, SureMed Compliance. A.P. Dicker: Advisory/Consultancy: Roche, EMD Serono, Celldex, Janssen, Cybrexa, Self Care Catalysts, Oncohost, ThirdBridge, Noxopharm, Varian, Accordant, Moleculin. H.S.L. Jim: Advisory/Consultancy: RedHill BioPharma; Janssen Scientific Affairs, Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
LBA87 - A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial of ambulatory toxicity management in patients receiving adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer (AToM)
Presenter: Monika Krzyzanowska
Session: Proffered Paper - Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1809O - TRheuMa registry provides real world data on rheumatic immune-related adverse events
Presenter: Karolina Benesova
Session: Proffered Paper - Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1810O - Impact of malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria in cancer patients admitted to hospital
Presenter: Martin Nunez Abad
Session: Proffered Paper - Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1504O - Relationship between sarcopenia and anthracycline related cardiotoxicity in patients with cancer
Presenter: Omer Dizdar
Session: Proffered Paper - Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant LBA87, 1809O and 1568O
Presenter: Marianne Hjermstad
Session: Proffered Paper - Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Q&A and live discussion
Presenter: Stein Kaasa
Session: Proffered Paper - Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Webcast
Invited Discussant 1810O and 1504O
Presenter: Jayne Wood
Session: Proffered Paper - Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Q&A and live discussion
Presenter: Stein Kaasa
Session: Proffered Paper - Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Webcast