Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini Oral - Supportive and palliative care

1816MO - ICES (International Carboplatin Emesis Survey) for the evaluation of the emetogenicity of carboplatin-based chemotherapy – with a focus on nausea. MASCC Antiemetic Study Group survey

Date

18 Sep 2020

Session

Mini Oral - Supportive and palliative care

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Teresa Smit

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S988-S1017. 10.1016/annonc/annonc291

Authors

T. Smit1, A. Chan2, M.R. Chasen3, R. Bhargava3, S. Bošnjak4, A. Zilic4, J.T. Chia5, A.A. Jabbar6, Z. Yaxiong7, M. de Necker8, T.V. Mhazo8, L. Heyman9, B.L. Rapoport10

Author affiliations

  • 1 Pharmacy Department, The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, 2196 - Johannesburg/ZA
  • 2 Pharmacy, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, 92617 - Irvine/US
  • 3 Palliative Care Unit, William Osler Health System - Brampton Civic Hospital, L6R 3J7 - Brampton/CA
  • 4 Supportive Oncology & Palliative Care, The Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Dept., 11000 - Belgrade/RS
  • 5 Department Of Pharmacy,, National University of Singapore,, 168753 - Singapore/BL
  • 6 Department Of Oncology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, 74800 - Karachi/PK
  • 7 Department Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangdong,/CN
  • 8 Tcd-global, TCD-Global, 0157 - Centurion,/ZA
  • 9 Department Oncology, The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, 2196 - Rosebank/ZA
  • 10 Department Of Immunology, University of Pretoria, 0002 - Pretoria/ZA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1816MO

Background

Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following carboplatin containing chemotherapy regimen remains a considerable problem for cancer patients (pts) despite standard antiemetic prophylaxis. This MASCC study was undertaken to prospectively evaluate the incidence of CINV in pts undergoing carboplatin-based chemotherapy receiving guidelines consistent CINV prophylaxis (GCCP). All sites did not prescribe NK1-RA as it is not included in all institutional guidelines.

Methods

The study enrolled 207 pts undergoing carboplatin-based chemotherapy, the current analysis evaluated cycle 1 of the first 155 pts. Pt diaries were used to collect data from day 1-10 beginning with cycle 1. Nausea was reported by the pts using a visual analog scale (VAS) with the end-point being no nausea. Vomiting episodes were recorded in the pts’ diaries.

Results

There were 103 females and 52 males, with a mean age of 64 (30-85). The overall incidence of acute and delayed nausea for was 17% and 25% respectively. The incidence of nausea of entire population was significantly higher than vomiting (58% vs. 14%; Chi2 22.271 p<0.000). The use of NK1-RA was associated with a significant decrease in time to first vomiting for cycle 1 (p<0.041) and subsequent cycle 2-6 (p<0.0075). Time to first nausea was not significant for cycle 1 or subsequent cycles. In a logistic regression model factors associated with acute nausea in cycle 1 included history of motion sickness (p< 0.0090), comorbidities (p< 0.0084), history of morning sickness (p< 0.0090), previous chemotherapy (p< 0.0096), anemia (p< 0.0209). A separate logistic regression analysis for delayed nausea in cycle 1 showed that prior radiotherapy (p<0.0093) and a history of morning sickness (p<0.0195) were significant.

Conclusions

Despite GCCP and the usage of NK1-RA, carboplatin induced nausea remains a major unmet medical need in cancer pts. Further research should focus on management of nausea, risk factors and the impact of nausea on quality of life and in pts undergoing carboplatin-based treatment.

Clinical trial identification

ICES.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank.

Funding

GSK (Tesaro).

Disclosure

S. Bošnjak: Honoraria (self): Helsinn; Honoraria (self): Angelini; Honoraria (self): Amicus, ; Honoraria (self): Infarm ; Honoraria (self): MSD, ; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): PharmaSwiss, ; Honoraria (self): Actavis. B.L. Rapoport: Research grant/Funding (self): GSK (TESARO); Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.