Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini Oral - Supportive and palliative care

1814MO - Addition of aprepitant improves acute emesis control in children and adolescents receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia: A randomized, open-label trial

Date

18 Sep 2020

Session

Mini Oral - Supportive and palliative care

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Leukaemias

Presenters

Atul Sharma

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S988-S1017. 10.1016/annonc/annonc291

Authors

A. Sharma, S. Bakhshi, A. Sharma, D. Pushpam, A. Tiwari, A. Garg, D. Dhawan, R. Bisht

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology Department, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110029 - New Delhi/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1814MO

Background

The use of aprepitant as an add-on prophylactic agent has been shown to improve chemotherapy-induced vomiting (CIV) in children receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Anti-emetic prophylaxis is additionally challenging during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), where the role of aprepitant has not been formally evaluated.

Methods

A randomized, open-label trial was conducted at our centre where chemotherapy naïve children between 5-18 years with diagnosis of AML being planned for induction chemotherapy (3+7 regimen) were included. All study participants received ondansetron (0.15mg/kg) 8 hourly for 8 days starting 30min prior to chemotherapy. Children belonging to aprepitant group additionally received aprepitant capsules (15-40 kg = days 1-3, 80 mg; >40 kg = day 1, 125 mg and days 2-3, 80 mg) starting from 1 h before chemotherapy. The proportion of patients with CIV in acute phase (day 1-day 8), delayed phase (day 9-day 13) and reported adverse effects were recorded. Acute and delayed nausea was also recorded as secondary end point.

Results

Total of 78 children were randomized (37 in the aprepitant group and 41 in the control group). The proportion of participants achieving a complete response in CIV was significantly higher in the aprepitant group compared to the control group overall (51% vs 22%; p=0.007) and especially in the acute phase (59% vs 29%; p=0.007). The time to the first episode of vomiting was also significantly higher in the aprepitant group (p=0.0004). The reported adverse events were similar between the two groups. There was no difference in acute and delayed nausea.

Conclusions

The use of aprepitant as add-on prophylactic anti-emetic during induction chemotherapy for AML significantly improves CIV rate in children especially in acute phase.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Dr Atul Sharma.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.