Abstract 143P
Background
Atezo SC (with recombinant human hyaluronidase) is approved in the EU and US in the same indications as atezo IV based on IMscin001 (NCT03735121) data. IMscin002 (NCT05171777) data show that most pts (70.7%; n=87/123) prefer atezo SC vs IV. We present exploratory analyses on this preference and its strength, for different pt subgroups from IMscin002.
Methods
Eligible pts ≥18 years old with EGFR/ALK wild-type tumors had PD-L1+ resected NSCLC (Stage II, IIIA or selected IIIB; AJCC 8th ed) with prior chemotherapy and no evidence of recurrence, or untreated PD-L1-high Stage IV NSCLC. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo SC or atezo IV for 3 weeks, and switched to the alternative formulation after Cycle 3. Primary endpoint: pt preference for atezo SC or IV (or no preference), evaluated at Cycle 6 or after ≥2 consecutive administrations of each formulation in pts who discontinued before Cycle 6, via pt preference questionnaires (Question 1: preference for one formulation [or no preference]; Question 2 [exploratory analysis]: strength of preference for this formulation).
Results
At data cutoff (9 Nov 2023), 123 evaluable pts answered Question 1 (atezo SC preferred: n=87; atezo IV preferred: n=26; no preference: n=10). Of the pts who also indicated their strength of preference for atezo SC (n=87) or IV (n=25), 35.6% had a very strong preference, 50.6% had a fairly strong preference and 13.8% had a not very strong preference for atezo SC; vs 28.0%, 44.0% and 28.0% for atezo IV, respectively. Preference for atezo SC or IV in different pt subgroups is shown in the Table. These data were generally consistent with those seen in the overall population, except for pts >74 years old who showed a stronger preference for atezo SC vs IV. Table: 143P
Preference for atezo, % | |||
SC | IV | No preference | |
Age, years (n) ≤60 (34) >60–≤67 (32) >67–≤74 (33) >74 (24)* | 76.4 65.7 57.6 87.6 | 23.6 21.9 27.3 4.2 | 0 12.5 15.2 4.2 |
Sex (n) Female (39)† Male (84) | 66.6 72.6 | 23.1 19.1 | 7.7 8.3 |
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (n) 0 (60)‡ 1 (63) | 68.3 73.0 | 23.4 17.4 | 6.7 9.5 |
Disease stage (n) II–III (48) IV (75)§ | 64.6 74.7 | 25.1 17.3 | 10.4 6.7 |
Mean injection duration at Cycles 1–6, min (n) ≤6.0 (34) >6.0–≤7.0 (24) >7.0–≤8.4 (34)¶ >8.4 (31) | 70.5 54.1 79.4 74.2 | 14.7 33.4 14.7 22.6 | 14.7 12.5 2.9 3.2 |
Data shown as a % of the total number of evaluable pts who answered Questions 1 and 2 (n=123) Strength of preference missing for 1 pt who preferred atezo IV: *4.2%; †2.6%; ‡1.6%; §1.3%; ¶2.9%
Conclusions
Pts showed higher preference for atezo SC vs IV irrespective of their baseline/disease characteristics or injection administration times. A stronger preference for atezo SC vs IV was shown in older pts.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05171777.
Editorial acknowledgement
This study is sponsored by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Third party medical writing assistance, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Lietta Nicolaides, PhD of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Legal entity responsible for the study
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Funding
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Disclosure
M. Majem Tarruella: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Helsinn Therapeutics, Takeda, Sanofi, Janssen Oncology, Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Helsinn Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations and Expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche, AstraZeneca . Z. Zvirbule: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: GSK, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Principal Investigator: Merck Sharp & Dohme Latvija, Roche, Genentech, Shanghai Henlius Biotech. E.P. Korbenfeld: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Knight; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Centro Oncologico; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, MSD. J. Kolb-Sielecki: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Local PI: Warmian-Masurian Center of Pulmonary Diseases. L.A. Herraez Baranda: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. A.Y. Castro Sanchez: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. A. Bustillos: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. L.X. Liu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Genentech, Inc. F. Cappuzzo: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, PharmaMar, Novocure, Mirati, Galecto, OSE, Illumina, ThermoFisher, MSD; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, PharmaMar, Novocure, Mirati, Galecto, OSE, Illumina, ThermoFisher, MSD; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, PharmaMar, Novocure, Mirati, Galecto, OSE, Illumina, ThermoFisher, MSD.
Resources from the same session
76P - Fixed 2-year vs. continuous duration immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients diagnosed with advanced cancer: to continue or not to continue?
Presenter: Miles Smith
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
77P - A new prognostic index for patients with advanced BTC treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine and durvalumab
Presenter: MARA PERSANO
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
79P - Relevance of combined positive score (CPS) & low-dose immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in microsatellite stable (MSS) advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GC): A multi-institution analysis
Presenter: Anant Ramaswamy
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
80P - Tumor markers evolution in pts treated with TCE and association with radiologic response
Presenter: Constance d'Abrigeon
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Predictive value of inflammatory ratios on the outcome of advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy: A multicentric analysis
Presenter: Aleksandar Popovic
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
82P - Predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy efficacy in locally advanced cancer patients: A retrospective analysis based on changes in tumor shrinkage rate and lymphocyte count
Presenter: Zhanjie Zhang
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
83P - Effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with and without surgery in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study
Presenter: xuqiang liao
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
84P - Safety Of Treatment With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors In Older Adults With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Presenter: Verene Dougoud-Chauvin
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
86P - Treatment trajectories and outcome following irAE related hospitalization in metastatic cancer patients
Presenter: Veera Nurmela
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
87P - Access to vedolizumab for the management of immune-related colitis (IRC): A United Kingdom study
Presenter: Faye Coe
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract