Abstract 143P
Background
Atezo SC (with recombinant human hyaluronidase) is approved in the EU and US in the same indications as atezo IV based on IMscin001 (NCT03735121) data. IMscin002 (NCT05171777) data show that most pts (70.7%; n=87/123) prefer atezo SC vs IV. We present exploratory analyses on this preference and its strength, for different pt subgroups from IMscin002.
Methods
Eligible pts ≥18 years old with EGFR/ALK wild-type tumors had PD-L1+ resected NSCLC (Stage II, IIIA or selected IIIB; AJCC 8th ed) with prior chemotherapy and no evidence of recurrence, or untreated PD-L1-high Stage IV NSCLC. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo SC or atezo IV for 3 weeks, and switched to the alternative formulation after Cycle 3. Primary endpoint: pt preference for atezo SC or IV (or no preference), evaluated at Cycle 6 or after ≥2 consecutive administrations of each formulation in pts who discontinued before Cycle 6, via pt preference questionnaires (Question 1: preference for one formulation [or no preference]; Question 2 [exploratory analysis]: strength of preference for this formulation).
Results
At data cutoff (9 Nov 2023), 123 evaluable pts answered Question 1 (atezo SC preferred: n=87; atezo IV preferred: n=26; no preference: n=10). Of the pts who also indicated their strength of preference for atezo SC (n=87) or IV (n=25), 35.6% had a very strong preference, 50.6% had a fairly strong preference and 13.8% had a not very strong preference for atezo SC; vs 28.0%, 44.0% and 28.0% for atezo IV, respectively. Preference for atezo SC or IV in different pt subgroups is shown in the Table. These data were generally consistent with those seen in the overall population, except for pts >74 years old who showed a stronger preference for atezo SC vs IV. Table: 143P
Preference for atezo, % | |||
SC | IV | No preference | |
Age, years (n) ≤60 (34) >60–≤67 (32) >67–≤74 (33) >74 (24)* | 76.4 65.7 57.6 87.6 | 23.6 21.9 27.3 4.2 | 0 12.5 15.2 4.2 |
Sex (n) Female (39)† Male (84) | 66.6 72.6 | 23.1 19.1 | 7.7 8.3 |
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (n) 0 (60)‡ 1 (63) | 68.3 73.0 | 23.4 17.4 | 6.7 9.5 |
Disease stage (n) II–III (48) IV (75)§ | 64.6 74.7 | 25.1 17.3 | 10.4 6.7 |
Mean injection duration at Cycles 1–6, min (n) ≤6.0 (34) >6.0–≤7.0 (24) >7.0–≤8.4 (34)¶ >8.4 (31) | 70.5 54.1 79.4 74.2 | 14.7 33.4 14.7 22.6 | 14.7 12.5 2.9 3.2 |
Data shown as a % of the total number of evaluable pts who answered Questions 1 and 2 (n=123) Strength of preference missing for 1 pt who preferred atezo IV: *4.2%; †2.6%; ‡1.6%; §1.3%; ¶2.9%
Conclusions
Pts showed higher preference for atezo SC vs IV irrespective of their baseline/disease characteristics or injection administration times. A stronger preference for atezo SC vs IV was shown in older pts.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05171777.
Editorial acknowledgement
This study is sponsored by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Third party medical writing assistance, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Lietta Nicolaides, PhD of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Legal entity responsible for the study
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Funding
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Disclosure
M. Majem Tarruella: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Helsinn Therapeutics, Takeda, Sanofi, Janssen Oncology, Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Helsinn Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations and Expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche, AstraZeneca . Z. Zvirbule: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: GSK, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Principal Investigator: Merck Sharp & Dohme Latvija, Roche, Genentech, Shanghai Henlius Biotech. E.P. Korbenfeld: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Knight; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Centro Oncologico; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, MSD. J. Kolb-Sielecki: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Local PI: Warmian-Masurian Center of Pulmonary Diseases. L.A. Herraez Baranda: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. A.Y. Castro Sanchez: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. A. Bustillos: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. L.X. Liu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Genentech, Inc. F. Cappuzzo: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, PharmaMar, Novocure, Mirati, Galecto, OSE, Illumina, ThermoFisher, MSD; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, PharmaMar, Novocure, Mirati, Galecto, OSE, Illumina, ThermoFisher, MSD; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, PharmaMar, Novocure, Mirati, Galecto, OSE, Illumina, ThermoFisher, MSD.
Resources from the same session
124P - AI-designed cancer vaccines: Antigens from the dark genome are promising cancer vaccine targets
Presenter: Daniela Kleine-Kohlbrecher
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
125P - Enhancing the efficacy of neoantigen tumor vaccines in melanoma treatment through different administration times
Presenter: Kai Xiao
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
126P - Combination of oncolytic viruses, radiation therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in a breast cancer model
Presenter: Olga Bezborodova
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
127P - Combining chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors with an engineered oncolytic adenovirus encoding a human vIL-2 cytokine to treat pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Nea Ojala
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
128P - Non-coding DNA lipid nanoparticles elicit antitumor immune responses and synergize with anti-PDL1 antibodies in mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Alba Rodriguez Garcia
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
129P - Computational approaches for enhancing the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy
Presenter: Byungho Lim
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
130P - Neoadjuvant treatment with a bispecific antibody cadonilimab in dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colorectal cancer: Preliminary results from a phase II trial
Presenter: Caifeng Gong
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
131P - The efficacy and safety of cadonilimab with or without trastuzumab in combination with SOX as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric (G) or gastroesophageal Junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA)
Presenter: Wenhui Yang
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
132P - An open-label, prospective phase II study of cadonilimab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer (AK104-IIT-003)
Presenter: Jie Tang
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
133P - The efficacy and safety of KN046 combined with axitinib for previously untreated and checkpoint inhibitor treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Li Zhang
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract