Abstract 143P
Background
Atezo SC (with recombinant human hyaluronidase) is approved in the EU and US in the same indications as atezo IV based on IMscin001 (NCT03735121) data. IMscin002 (NCT05171777) data show that most pts (70.7%; n=87/123) prefer atezo SC vs IV. We present exploratory analyses on this preference and its strength, for different pt subgroups from IMscin002.
Methods
Eligible pts ≥18 years old with EGFR/ALK wild-type tumors had PD-L1+ resected NSCLC (Stage II, IIIA or selected IIIB; AJCC 8th ed) with prior chemotherapy and no evidence of recurrence, or untreated PD-L1-high Stage IV NSCLC. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo SC or atezo IV for 3 weeks, and switched to the alternative formulation after Cycle 3. Primary endpoint: pt preference for atezo SC or IV (or no preference), evaluated at Cycle 6 or after ≥2 consecutive administrations of each formulation in pts who discontinued before Cycle 6, via pt preference questionnaires (Question 1: preference for one formulation [or no preference]; Question 2 [exploratory analysis]: strength of preference for this formulation).
Results
At data cutoff (9 Nov 2023), 123 evaluable pts answered Question 1 (atezo SC preferred: n=87; atezo IV preferred: n=26; no preference: n=10). Of the pts who also indicated their strength of preference for atezo SC (n=87) or IV (n=25), 35.6% had a very strong preference, 50.6% had a fairly strong preference and 13.8% had a not very strong preference for atezo SC; vs 28.0%, 44.0% and 28.0% for atezo IV, respectively. Preference for atezo SC or IV in different pt subgroups is shown in the Table. These data were generally consistent with those seen in the overall population, except for pts >74 years old who showed a stronger preference for atezo SC vs IV. Table: 143P
Preference for atezo, % | |||
SC | IV | No preference | |
Age, years (n) ≤60 (34) >60–≤67 (32) >67–≤74 (33) >74 (24)* | 76.4 65.7 57.6 87.6 | 23.6 21.9 27.3 4.2 | 0 12.5 15.2 4.2 |
Sex (n) Female (39)† Male (84) | 66.6 72.6 | 23.1 19.1 | 7.7 8.3 |
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (n) 0 (60)‡ 1 (63) | 68.3 73.0 | 23.4 17.4 | 6.7 9.5 |
Disease stage (n) II–III (48) IV (75)§ | 64.6 74.7 | 25.1 17.3 | 10.4 6.7 |
Mean injection duration at Cycles 1–6, min (n) ≤6.0 (34) >6.0–≤7.0 (24) >7.0–≤8.4 (34)¶ >8.4 (31) | 70.5 54.1 79.4 74.2 | 14.7 33.4 14.7 22.6 | 14.7 12.5 2.9 3.2 |
Data shown as a % of the total number of evaluable pts who answered Questions 1 and 2 (n=123) Strength of preference missing for 1 pt who preferred atezo IV: *4.2%; †2.6%; ‡1.6%; §1.3%; ¶2.9%
Conclusions
Pts showed higher preference for atezo SC vs IV irrespective of their baseline/disease characteristics or injection administration times. A stronger preference for atezo SC vs IV was shown in older pts.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05171777.
Editorial acknowledgement
This study is sponsored by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Third party medical writing assistance, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Lietta Nicolaides, PhD of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Legal entity responsible for the study
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Funding
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Disclosure
M. Majem Tarruella: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Helsinn Therapeutics, Takeda, Sanofi, Janssen Oncology, Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Helsinn Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations and Expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche, AstraZeneca . Z. Zvirbule: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: GSK, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Principal Investigator: Merck Sharp & Dohme Latvija, Roche, Genentech, Shanghai Henlius Biotech. E.P. Korbenfeld: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Knight; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Centro Oncologico; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, MSD. J. Kolb-Sielecki: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Local PI: Warmian-Masurian Center of Pulmonary Diseases. L.A. Herraez Baranda: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. A.Y. Castro Sanchez: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. A. Bustillos: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. L.X. Liu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Genentech, Inc. F. Cappuzzo: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, PharmaMar, Novocure, Mirati, Galecto, OSE, Illumina, ThermoFisher, MSD; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, PharmaMar, Novocure, Mirati, Galecto, OSE, Illumina, ThermoFisher, MSD; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, PharmaMar, Novocure, Mirati, Galecto, OSE, Illumina, ThermoFisher, MSD.
Resources from the same session
63P - Single-cell RNA-seq combined with bulk RNA-seq revealed the involvement of pancreatic cancer tissue-resident macrophages in tumour progression and the immunotherapy response
Presenter: Bin Wu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
64P - Gene-editing of T cells to provide resistance against macrophage-mediated suppression: setting up an in vitro model
Presenter: Rui Coelho
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
68P - Real-world outcomes of nivolumab and/or ipilimumab in patients with stage III-IV melanoma, MELIOR study
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
69P - Dose-dependent detrimental effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on clinical outcomes from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients (pts) with solid tumors
Presenter: elena speziale
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
70P - Efficacy of PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in patients with oncogenic-driven non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Haowei Wang
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
71P - Discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors for reasons other than disease progression and the impact on relapse and survival of advanced melanoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Konstantinos Lallas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
72P - Concurrent local therapy (CLT) extends clinical benefit of tebentafusp (tebe) in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients (pts)
Presenter: Tristan Lim
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
73P - Impact of Assessment-to-Treatment Interval on the Predictive Value of PD-L1 Expression in Melanoma
Presenter: Cecilie Vestergaard
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
74P - Real-world impact of adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy on survival in Danish resected stage III melanoma patients
Presenter: Marie Weitemeyer
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
75P - Real-world data of adebrelimab in the first-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Yong Song
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract