Abstract 104P
Background
Bladder-sparing treatment has emerged as an alternative choice for patients who are concerned about the life quality after radical cystectomy (RC). The optimal strategy for bladder-sparing treatment such as trimodal therapy (TMT) showed similar effects with RC. Since neoadjuvant immunotherapy has illuminated considerable response in MIBC, we aim to study whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy can improve the bladder-sparing rate in MIBC patients.
Methods
30 planned patients with MIBC (T2-4a N0-1 M0) received cisplatin 70mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 4.5 on day 1 every 3 weeks (Q3W) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on the 1st and 8th day of each 21-day cycle x 4 cycles. Tislelizumab 200mg was administered on the 14th day of each 21-day cycle at the 3rd and 4th cycles. CT and cystoscopy imaging were carried out to evaluate disease progression. After the 4th treatment, radical cystectomy, partial cystectomy or TURBT were perform in accordance with the disease status. For continuous bladder-sparing treatment, 2 additional cycles of tislelizumab were performed. Bladder-sparing rate was settled as the exploratory endpoint based on 2-years of follow-up and predictive biomarker will be analyzed.
Results
To date, 21 of 30 pts have been enrolled and 17 pts have completed the regimen. 2pts were excluded because of complicating with other disease (cerebral infraction or rectal cancer), and 2pts voluntarily quit due to intolerance of chemotherapeutic adverse effect (fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms). 2pts showed partial response to the therapy and received RC after disease progression. 1pt have no response to the therapy and received palliative care as unsuitable for surgery. The remaining 10 of 17 pts successfully preserved their bladder by achieving pT0 (58.8%) after treatment. Among them, 3 pts have been followed up over 1 year and no relapse was observed.
Conclusions
These data support neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy as a feasible bladder-sparing choice for MIBC patients. Further completed follow-up data and biomarker analysis will accurately identify patients who are suitable for this therapy.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2100050763.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
35P - Peripheral immunotype classification for monitoring Soft Tissue Sarcoma patients
Presenter: Jani Sofia Almeida
Session: Poster Display
36P - Expression of germinal center B cell- and Th17 cell-related transcripts are prognostic of soft-tissue sarcoma patient outcomes
Presenter: Giulia Petroni
Session: Poster Display
38P - Machine learning-based pathomics model to predict the infiltration of Treg and prognosis in IDH-wt GBM
Presenter: Shaoli Peng
Session: Poster Display
40P - The role of low avidity tumour-specific CD8+ T cells in immunotherapeutic response to anti-PD-1
Presenter: Doreen Lau
Session: Poster Display
41P - Contrasting drivers of response to immunotherapy across solid tumour types: results from analysis of >2500 cases
Presenter: Danwen Qian
Session: Poster Display
42P - TCCIA: A Comprehensive Resource for Exploring CircRNA in Cancer Immunotherapy
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster Display
43P - Immune and tumor cells expression of VISTA in a panel of cancer indications: A strategy to inform selection of patients treated with anti-VISTA
Presenter: Pierre Launay
Session: Poster Display
44P - Exploratory Analysis of Peripheral Pharmacodynamic (PD) Biomarkers After Sitravatinib (Sitra) and Tislelizumab (TIS) in Advanced Solid Tumors: SAFFRON-103
Presenter: Yi-Long Wu
Session: Poster Display
45P - Protein biomarkers associated with organ-specific immune-related toxicity and response to management identified by proteome analysis of extracellular vesicles from plasma
Presenter: Anders Kverneland
Session: Poster Display