Abstract 104P
Background
Bladder-sparing treatment has emerged as an alternative choice for patients who are concerned about the life quality after radical cystectomy (RC). The optimal strategy for bladder-sparing treatment such as trimodal therapy (TMT) showed similar effects with RC. Since neoadjuvant immunotherapy has illuminated considerable response in MIBC, we aim to study whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy can improve the bladder-sparing rate in MIBC patients.
Methods
30 planned patients with MIBC (T2-4a N0-1 M0) received cisplatin 70mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 4.5 on day 1 every 3 weeks (Q3W) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on the 1st and 8th day of each 21-day cycle x 4 cycles. Tislelizumab 200mg was administered on the 14th day of each 21-day cycle at the 3rd and 4th cycles. CT and cystoscopy imaging were carried out to evaluate disease progression. After the 4th treatment, radical cystectomy, partial cystectomy or TURBT were perform in accordance with the disease status. For continuous bladder-sparing treatment, 2 additional cycles of tislelizumab were performed. Bladder-sparing rate was settled as the exploratory endpoint based on 2-years of follow-up and predictive biomarker will be analyzed.
Results
To date, 21 of 30 pts have been enrolled and 17 pts have completed the regimen. 2pts were excluded because of complicating with other disease (cerebral infraction or rectal cancer), and 2pts voluntarily quit due to intolerance of chemotherapeutic adverse effect (fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms). 2pts showed partial response to the therapy and received RC after disease progression. 1pt have no response to the therapy and received palliative care as unsuitable for surgery. The remaining 10 of 17 pts successfully preserved their bladder by achieving pT0 (58.8%) after treatment. Among them, 3 pts have been followed up over 1 year and no relapse was observed.
Conclusions
These data support neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy as a feasible bladder-sparing choice for MIBC patients. Further completed follow-up data and biomarker analysis will accurately identify patients who are suitable for this therapy.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2100050763.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
60P - Adaptive NK cells as a therapeutic option for childhood leukaemia
Presenter: Zoya Eskandarian
Session: Poster Display
61P - Unlocking the Power of Natural Killer Cells: Precision Selection with Cutting-Edge Microfluidics
Presenter: Neelima KC
Session: Poster Display
63TiP - A phase I study of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in advanced solid tumors used an optimized regimen: MIZAR trial
Presenter: Qing Xu
Session: Poster Display
68P - Real-world (rw) outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic (m) NSCLC and STK11, KEAP1 and/or KRAS mutations (mut) receiving PD-(L)1-based treatment (tx): CORRELATE
Presenter: Solange Peters
Session: Poster Display
70P - LIST (Lung Initiative on Sequence Therapy), a real-world study of nivolumab for advanced NSCLC in France: first effectiveness, safety, and IO-rechallenge results
Presenter: Benoît GODBERT
Session: Poster Display
72P - Camrelizumab plus apatinib after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer?A multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 study
Presenter: Hui Zhouguang
Session: Poster Display
74P - A single-center, Phase II study of surufatinib combined with toripalimab, pemetrexed(A), and platinum (P) in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC)
Presenter: Wen Feng Fang
Session: Poster Display
75P - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of cemiplimab + chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): EMPOWER-lung 3 liver metastases subpopulation
Presenter: Ana Baramidze
Session: Poster Display