Abstract 1165P
Background
The indication for lymphadenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN) remains unclear. Previous systematic reviews have reported varying frequencies of lymph node metastasis (LNM) based on tumor size, histopathological differentiation, and functionality. However, further stratification of LNM is needed for optimal lymphadenectomy. Thus, we addressed these issues with PNEN cases resected at our hospital.
Methods
In this study, we included 92 patients who underwent PNEN resection without distant metastasis between 1986 and December 2022. We retrospectively analyzed the risk factors of LNM, its stratification, and its prognosis.
Results
The median age was 60 years, and 39 patients (42.4%) were female. Hereditary diseases included 8 with MEN-1 and 5 with VHL disease. Non-functional tumors (NF) accounted for 66 (71.7%), insulinomas for 17 (18.5%), gastrinomas for 5 (5.4%), glucagonomas for 2 (2.2%), and serotoninomas for 2 (2.2%). Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was performed in 32 (34.8%), distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 41 (44.6%), total pancreatectomy (TP) in 4 (4.3%) and other procedures in 15 (16.3%). The distribution of Grade (G) 1/2/3 was 57 (61.9%)/32 (34.8%)/3 (3.3%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the significant risk factors of LNM were gastrinomas (p=0.007), and tumor size > 2 cm (p=0.010). LNM was absent in 43 NF with tumors ≤ 2 cm. LNM were found in 3 NF with G1 larger than 5 cm. The overall 5-year and 10-year survival rates for patients with LNM were 81.5% and 71.3%, respectively, compared to 96.7% and 92.1% for those without LNM (p=0.049). The 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 78.8% and 67.5% for patients with LNM, versus 94.1% and 94.1% for those without LNM (p=0.002). Patients with LNM had significantly worse outcomes than those without LNM.
Conclusions
Lymphadenectomy might be unnecessary for NF or non-gastrinoma/glucagonoma G1 tumors that are smaller than 2 cm. These findings would suggest that the need for lymphadenectomy could be stratified based on tumor functionality, size, and grade. Further prospective studies are required to validate these findings.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
972P - Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center real-world study from the LINK Research Network
Presenter: Jung Yong Hong
Session: Poster session 17
973P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall survival using real-world data from TrinetX platform
Presenter: Lisardo Ugidos De La Varga
Session: Poster session 17
977P - Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus tislelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster session 17
978P - Efficacy and safety analysis of transarterial chemoembolization combined donafenib with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors in for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A prospective, single-arm, single center, phase Ⅱ clinical study
Presenter: Jinpeng Li
Session: Poster session 17
979P - Initial results from the phase II randomized trial comparing TACE with irinotecan and mitomycin C to doxorubicin in intermediate stage HCC (IRITACE trial)
Presenter: Oliver Waidmann
Session: Poster session 17