Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 17

1165P - The significance and indications for lymphadenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 17

Topics

Surgical Oncology

Tumour Site

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Presenters

Yosuke Uematsu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S749-S761. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1598

Authors

Y. Uematsu1, M. Tanaka1, M. Kitago2, H. Yagi1, Y. Abe1, Y. Hasegawa1, S. Hori1, Y. Nakano1, Y. Kitagawa1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 160-8582 - Shinjuku-ku/JP
  • 2 Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 160-0016 - Tokyo/JP

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1165P

Background

The indication for lymphadenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN) remains unclear. Previous systematic reviews have reported varying frequencies of lymph node metastasis (LNM) based on tumor size, histopathological differentiation, and functionality. However, further stratification of LNM is needed for optimal lymphadenectomy. Thus, we addressed these issues with PNEN cases resected at our hospital.

Methods

In this study, we included 92 patients who underwent PNEN resection without distant metastasis between 1986 and December 2022. We retrospectively analyzed the risk factors of LNM, its stratification, and its prognosis.

Results

The median age was 60 years, and 39 patients (42.4%) were female. Hereditary diseases included 8 with MEN-1 and 5 with VHL disease. Non-functional tumors (NF) accounted for 66 (71.7%), insulinomas for 17 (18.5%), gastrinomas for 5 (5.4%), glucagonomas for 2 (2.2%), and serotoninomas for 2 (2.2%). Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was performed in 32 (34.8%), distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 41 (44.6%), total pancreatectomy (TP) in 4 (4.3%) and other procedures in 15 (16.3%). The distribution of Grade (G) 1/2/3 was 57 (61.9%)/32 (34.8%)/3 (3.3%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the significant risk factors of LNM were gastrinomas (p=0.007), and tumor size > 2 cm (p=0.010). LNM was absent in 43 NF with tumors ≤ 2 cm. LNM were found in 3 NF with G1 larger than 5 cm. The overall 5-year and 10-year survival rates for patients with LNM were 81.5% and 71.3%, respectively, compared to 96.7% and 92.1% for those without LNM (p=0.049). The 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 78.8% and 67.5% for patients with LNM, versus 94.1% and 94.1% for those without LNM (p=0.002). Patients with LNM had significantly worse outcomes than those without LNM.

Conclusions

Lymphadenectomy might be unnecessary for NF or non-gastrinoma/glucagonoma G1 tumors that are smaller than 2 cm. These findings would suggest that the need for lymphadenectomy could be stratified based on tumor functionality, size, and grade. Further prospective studies are required to validate these findings.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.