Abstract 1165P
Background
The indication for lymphadenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN) remains unclear. Previous systematic reviews have reported varying frequencies of lymph node metastasis (LNM) based on tumor size, histopathological differentiation, and functionality. However, further stratification of LNM is needed for optimal lymphadenectomy. Thus, we addressed these issues with PNEN cases resected at our hospital.
Methods
In this study, we included 92 patients who underwent PNEN resection without distant metastasis between 1986 and December 2022. We retrospectively analyzed the risk factors of LNM, its stratification, and its prognosis.
Results
The median age was 60 years, and 39 patients (42.4%) were female. Hereditary diseases included 8 with MEN-1 and 5 with VHL disease. Non-functional tumors (NF) accounted for 66 (71.7%), insulinomas for 17 (18.5%), gastrinomas for 5 (5.4%), glucagonomas for 2 (2.2%), and serotoninomas for 2 (2.2%). Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was performed in 32 (34.8%), distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 41 (44.6%), total pancreatectomy (TP) in 4 (4.3%) and other procedures in 15 (16.3%). The distribution of Grade (G) 1/2/3 was 57 (61.9%)/32 (34.8%)/3 (3.3%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the significant risk factors of LNM were gastrinomas (p=0.007), and tumor size > 2 cm (p=0.010). LNM was absent in 43 NF with tumors ≤ 2 cm. LNM were found in 3 NF with G1 larger than 5 cm. The overall 5-year and 10-year survival rates for patients with LNM were 81.5% and 71.3%, respectively, compared to 96.7% and 92.1% for those without LNM (p=0.049). The 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 78.8% and 67.5% for patients with LNM, versus 94.1% and 94.1% for those without LNM (p=0.002). Patients with LNM had significantly worse outcomes than those without LNM.
Conclusions
Lymphadenectomy might be unnecessary for NF or non-gastrinoma/glucagonoma G1 tumors that are smaller than 2 cm. These findings would suggest that the need for lymphadenectomy could be stratified based on tumor functionality, size, and grade. Further prospective studies are required to validate these findings.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1427P - Predicting overall survival and prognostic indicator genes in esophagogastric cancer patients using machine learning and bioinformatics analysis
Presenter: Nguyen-Kieu Viet-Nhi
Session: Poster session 17
1428P - Total neoadjuvant FLOT chemotherapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma: An international cohort study
Presenter: Hollie Clements
Session: Poster session 17
1429P - Differences in esophageal cancer incidence and survival by race/ethnicity: A SEER analysis
Presenter: Ashwin Kulshrestha
Session: Poster session 17
1430P - Impact of menadione supplementation in the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer: A randomized phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Francisco Cezar Moraes
Session: Poster session 17
1431P - Assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A deep learning approach with voxel-level radiomics
Presenter: Yongling Ji
Session: Poster session 17
1432P - Safety of laparoscopic D2 distal gastrectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer patients: A prospective multicenter trial (CLASS-03a)
Presenter: Kun Yang
Session: Poster session 17