Abstract 818P
Background
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a low-volume, high-risk malignancy that requires complex treatment strategies, notably intensive remission induction chemotherapy (ICT) administered to eligible patients based on specific clinical and disease-related characteristics. However, ICT treatment harbors the risk of life-threatening complications. Given the potential benefits of increased practice, high-volume hospitals might be more adept in managing AML. To create understanding in the volume-outcome relationship in AML care, we conducted a nationwide, population-based study in the Netherlands to assess the association between hospital volume and patient outcomes in ICT-treated adult patients with AML.
Methods
We used data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), including all adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with AML between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. The association between hospital volume and overall survival (OS) was assessed using mixed effects Cox regression, adjusting for patient and disease characteristics (i.e., case-mix), with hospital as a random effect. We examined the association between hospital volume at different time points after ICT initiation, namely 30-day OS (i.e., after one ICT cycle), 42-day OS (i.e., after two cycles of ICT), and 100-day OS (i.e., after SCT).
Results
A total of, 4,060 adults (≥18 years) were diagnosed with AML in the Netherlands, of which 1,761 (43%) received ICT in 24 hospitals. Hospital volume per year ranged from 1 to 56 patients, with a median of 13 patients (IQR, 8-20 patients). Overall, an increase of 10 ICT-treated patients annually was associated with a 8% reduction in mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.98; P=0.01). This association was not significant at 30 and 42 days OS but became apparent after 100 days OS.
Conclusions
Our study shows that there is no association between hospital volume and short-term outcomes, but with longer-term outcomes, in ICT-treated adult patients with AML. While our findings support hospital volume as a metric in AML care, any policy shifts towards centralization based on volume must be carefully balanced, considering potential drawbacks and prioritizing patient welfare and the healthcare system.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1173P - Combining mass spectrometry with quantitative continuous scoring to unlock the full quantitative potential of immunohistochemistry
Presenter: Ana Hidalgo-Sastre
Session: Poster session 09
1174P - FLAMINGO: Accurate cancer detection from ultra-low-pass whole genome sequencing of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Daan Vessies
Session: Poster session 09
1175P - Universal circulating tumor DNA quantification using deep learning
Presenter: Anders Skanderup
Session: Poster session 09
Resources:
Abstract
1176P - Potential utility of ctDNA to detect false positive PET/CT in the evaluation of lymphoma response
Presenter: Alejandro martín-muñoz
Session: Poster session 09
1177P - FRESH: The Gustave Roussy program to facilitate access to liquid biopsy for precision oncology in France
Presenter: Etienne Rouleau
Session: Poster session 09
1178P - EGFR evaluation in non-small cell lung cancer: An artificial intelligence approach to pre-molecular analysis
Presenter: Chad Vanderbilt
Session: Poster session 09
1179P - WomEC: a novel diagnostic test for the detection of endometrial cancer in uterine fluids
Presenter: Antonio Gil-Moreno
Session: Poster session 09
1180P - An integrated metabolomics-based platform for early-stage detection of multiple cancers
Presenter: imliwati longkumer
Session: Poster session 09
1181P - Diagnostic target product profiles for cancer: A demand signaling tool to stimulate innovation in early cancer diagnosis
Presenter: Sonja Marjanovic
Session: Poster session 09