Abstract 818P
Background
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a low-volume, high-risk malignancy that requires complex treatment strategies, notably intensive remission induction chemotherapy (ICT) administered to eligible patients based on specific clinical and disease-related characteristics. However, ICT treatment harbors the risk of life-threatening complications. Given the potential benefits of increased practice, high-volume hospitals might be more adept in managing AML. To create understanding in the volume-outcome relationship in AML care, we conducted a nationwide, population-based study in the Netherlands to assess the association between hospital volume and patient outcomes in ICT-treated adult patients with AML.
Methods
We used data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), including all adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with AML between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. The association between hospital volume and overall survival (OS) was assessed using mixed effects Cox regression, adjusting for patient and disease characteristics (i.e., case-mix), with hospital as a random effect. We examined the association between hospital volume at different time points after ICT initiation, namely 30-day OS (i.e., after one ICT cycle), 42-day OS (i.e., after two cycles of ICT), and 100-day OS (i.e., after SCT).
Results
A total of, 4,060 adults (≥18 years) were diagnosed with AML in the Netherlands, of which 1,761 (43%) received ICT in 24 hospitals. Hospital volume per year ranged from 1 to 56 patients, with a median of 13 patients (IQR, 8-20 patients). Overall, an increase of 10 ICT-treated patients annually was associated with a 8% reduction in mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.98; P=0.01). This association was not significant at 30 and 42 days OS but became apparent after 100 days OS.
Conclusions
Our study shows that there is no association between hospital volume and short-term outcomes, but with longer-term outcomes, in ICT-treated adult patients with AML. While our findings support hospital volume as a metric in AML care, any policy shifts towards centralization based on volume must be carefully balanced, considering potential drawbacks and prioritizing patient welfare and the healthcare system.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
212P - BRGSF-HIS mice as a predictive tool for safety assessment of biologics
Presenter: Kader Thiam
Session: Poster session 09
213P - Constructing a high-definition patient-digital twin (PDT) in treatment-naïve women with advanced cancer
Presenter: Leonardo Garma
Session: Poster session 09
215P - Detection of MUTYH for the prognosis and chemotherapy responsiveness of patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Chi Wai Wong
Session: Poster session 09
216P - β-catenin is a potential prognostic biomarker in uterine sarcoma
Presenter: Ying Cai
Session: Poster session 09
218P - Exploiting a unique glycosaminoglycan for novel pan-cancer therapies and diagnostics
Presenter: Mette Agerbæk
Session: Poster session 09
219P - The landscape and prognostic impact of germline HLA-A subtypes in patients with advanced solid cancers
Presenter: Kyrillus Shohdy
Session: Poster session 09
220P - The role of fucosyltransferase 1 (FUT1) in CRC as a putative prognostic and predictive biomarker
Presenter: Lorenz Pammer
Session: Poster session 09
221P - ANGPTL4's role in cancer: A meta analysis and bioinformatics exploration
Presenter: Osama Younis
Session: Poster session 09
222P - Artificial intelligence (AI) based prognostication from baseline computed tomography (CT) scans in a phase III advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) trial
Presenter: Omar Khan
Session: Poster session 09