Abstract 2007P
Background
Urothelial tract cancer (UTC) holds the thirteenth position in terms of mortality worldwide. There are still gaps in the knowledge of the mutational landscape in patients with advanced disease after multiple lines of prior treatment. This study compares the genomic, transcriptomics, and targeted treatment options between metastatic UTC (mUTC) patients treated with multiple lines of therapy to newly diagnosed, untreated Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC).
Methods
Genomic and clinical data was retrieved from two cohorts: Heavily treated mUTC patients referred to the Copenhagen Prospective Personalized Oncology (CoPPO) project at Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen. Biopsies in CoPPO were performed at the time of enrollment. Data for pre-treated MIBC UTC patients were acquired from the Cancer Genome Atlas Bladder Cancer (TCGA BLCA) cohort. Analyses included RNA count data and 523 highly important cancer-related genes (TrueSight Oncology-500) for comparative analysis.
Results
Patients from the CoPPO cohort (n = 31) had a lower median age at first-line treatment than the TCGA BLCA cohort (n = 412), with no significant gender disparity. The predominant histology was urothelial cell carcinoma in both cohorts. Genomic analysis revealed no significant difference between the top mutated genes in the two cohorts, specifically looking into DNA damage repair genes. Molecular subtyping indicated a higher frequency of neuroendocrine differentiation in the CoPPO cohort. Thirteen percent of patients in the CoPPO cohort received targeted therapy based on genomic findings, and 16% received non-targeted treatment, totaling 29% receiving CoPPO treatment (9 patients). The remaining 71% received best supportive care. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a non-significant survival benefit for the intervention group in the CoPPO cohort.
Conclusions
When focusing on 523 highly relevant cancer genes, the mutational profile of mUTC patients who have undergone numerous treatment lines resembles that of newly diagnosed MIBC. These alterations can be targeted, indicating the potential advantage of early genomic testing for personalized treatment within clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
D.R. Stormoen: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer, Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, Johnson & Johnson; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck Serono. K.W. Mouw: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: EMD Serono, Pfizer, BMS, UroGen, Riva Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Pfizer, Novo Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Writing Engagement: UpToDate; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: OncLive. Z. Szallasi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Lantern Pharma. M. Rossing: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, AstraZeneca. F. Bagger: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Immunitrack, Hervolution, Aida Oncology. H. Pappot: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer, Merck Serono. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1987P - TROP-2 as a promising ADC target in penile squamous cell carcinoma that promotes cell proliferation by activating AKT through PKCα pathway
Presenter: Yi Tang
Session: Poster session 13
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1992P - Real-world (RW) characteristics and outcomes in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) treated with adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Hedyeh Ebrahimi
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13