Abstract 2007P
Background
Urothelial tract cancer (UTC) holds the thirteenth position in terms of mortality worldwide. There are still gaps in the knowledge of the mutational landscape in patients with advanced disease after multiple lines of prior treatment. This study compares the genomic, transcriptomics, and targeted treatment options between metastatic UTC (mUTC) patients treated with multiple lines of therapy to newly diagnosed, untreated Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC).
Methods
Genomic and clinical data was retrieved from two cohorts: Heavily treated mUTC patients referred to the Copenhagen Prospective Personalized Oncology (CoPPO) project at Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen. Biopsies in CoPPO were performed at the time of enrollment. Data for pre-treated MIBC UTC patients were acquired from the Cancer Genome Atlas Bladder Cancer (TCGA BLCA) cohort. Analyses included RNA count data and 523 highly important cancer-related genes (TrueSight Oncology-500) for comparative analysis.
Results
Patients from the CoPPO cohort (n = 31) had a lower median age at first-line treatment than the TCGA BLCA cohort (n = 412), with no significant gender disparity. The predominant histology was urothelial cell carcinoma in both cohorts. Genomic analysis revealed no significant difference between the top mutated genes in the two cohorts, specifically looking into DNA damage repair genes. Molecular subtyping indicated a higher frequency of neuroendocrine differentiation in the CoPPO cohort. Thirteen percent of patients in the CoPPO cohort received targeted therapy based on genomic findings, and 16% received non-targeted treatment, totaling 29% receiving CoPPO treatment (9 patients). The remaining 71% received best supportive care. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a non-significant survival benefit for the intervention group in the CoPPO cohort.
Conclusions
When focusing on 523 highly relevant cancer genes, the mutational profile of mUTC patients who have undergone numerous treatment lines resembles that of newly diagnosed MIBC. These alterations can be targeted, indicating the potential advantage of early genomic testing for personalized treatment within clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
D.R. Stormoen: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer, Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, Johnson & Johnson; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck Serono. K.W. Mouw: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: EMD Serono, Pfizer, BMS, UroGen, Riva Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Pfizer, Novo Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Writing Engagement: UpToDate; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: OncLive. Z. Szallasi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Lantern Pharma. M. Rossing: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, AstraZeneca. F. Bagger: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Immunitrack, Hervolution, Aida Oncology. H. Pappot: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer, Merck Serono. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
242P - Clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− early breast cancer (EBC) by prior systemic treatment (tx): A subgroup analysis of the NATALEE trial
Presenter: Nicholas McAndrew
Session: Poster session 13
243P - Prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer according to monarchE and NATALEE trials risk categories: Patient-level analysis of Mammella InterGruppo (MIG) and Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) randomised trials
Presenter: Luca Arecco
Session: Poster session 13
244P - Efficacy and safety of dalpiciclib, exemestane, and goserelin as neoadjuvant therapy in premenopausal HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients: A phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Yang Zhengjun
Session: Poster session 13
245P - Characteristics of real-world (RW) NATALEE and monarchE eligible populations: A US electronic health records (EHR) database analysis
Presenter: Paolo Tarantino
Session: Poster session 13
246P - Axillary management and outcomes after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in the randomized PELOPS trial
Presenter: Anna C. Weiss
Session: Poster session 13
247P - Concurrent versus sequential adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Luiz Felipe de Almeida
Session: Poster session 13
248P - Impact of unilateral mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction on vertebral alignment
Presenter: Jong-Ho Cheun
Session: Poster session 13
249P - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in inflammatory breast cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 trials of the German Breast Group (GBG)
Presenter: Laura Michel
Session: Poster session 13
250P - Development and validation of a 19-feature classifier that predicts response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in breast cancer patients
Presenter: Fresia Pareja
Session: Poster session 13