Abstract 1992P
Background
Clinical trials suggest that prior NAC treatment may improve adjuvant NIVO outcomes in pts with MIUC at high risk for recurrence after radical resection; investigation in RW pts could help inform treatment sequencing. We characterized RW pts with MIUC who received adjuvant NIVO stratified by whether they received prior NAC.
Methods
In this retrospective medical chart review of pts with stage II-IIIB MIUC who began adjuvant NIVO between 9/1/2021 and 11/25/2022, physicians from the Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network abstracted pt data from electronic records. Pt characteristics and survival point estimates per Kaplan–Meier analyses were summarized via descriptive statistics.
Results
253 pts with MIUC were treated with adjuvant NIVO; 141 (55.7%) received and 112 (44.3%) did not receive NAC. Median NAC duration was 2.8 mo; gemcitabine plus cisplatin (84.4%) was the most common regimen. Pts who received NAC were younger at diagnosis (mean, 64.0 vs 70.8 y) and more likely to have commercial insurance (40.4% vs 9.8%) vs pts who did not receive NAC. At adjuvant NIVO initiation, more pts who received NAC had stage IIIB disease (30.5% vs 17.9%), better functional status (ECOG PS 0 or 1, 97.2% vs 63.4%), and fewer comorbidities (mean NCI comorbidity index, 0.33 vs 0.71) vs pts who did not receive NAC. Majority of pts who did not receive NAC were cisplatin ineligible (78.6% vs 6.4%); the most common eligibility criterion was creatinine clearance (88.5%). Median follow-up from start of adjuvant NIVO was 13.3 mo in pts who received NAC and 12.3 mo in pts who did not receive NAC. Pts who received NAC had better 18-mo overall survival (90.1% vs 55.5%, P = 0.02) and 18-mo distant metastasis-free survival (86.6% vs 54.6%, P < 0.01) outcomes from the start of adjuvant NIVO.
Conclusions
Pts with MIUC who received NAC before adjuvant NIVO were overall younger, healthier, and more likely to have stage IIIB disease. RW outcomes of adjuvant NIVO were favorable overall, and NAC pts showed improved outcomes vs pts who did not receive NAC. Further research with extended follow-up and adjustment for baseline characteristics is needed to elucidate observed differences.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Funding
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
W.S. John: Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Bristol Myers Squibb, Sobi, Inc., Pfizer, AbbVie, Bayer, Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo Inc. S. Lucht: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Cardinal Health; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Covered travel and accommodation expenses to lobby U.S. Congress on behalf of cancer research funding for the NIH in Spring 2023: American Association for Cancer Research; Non-Financial Interests, Member: American Association for Cancer Research. T. Miller: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment, Former employee from 2021 to Nov 2023: Cardinal Health; Financial Interests, Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Flatiron Health. P. Pathak: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Contractor: Cardinal Health. E. Bland: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Cardinal Health. A.J. Klink: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Employee: Cardinal Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, Employee Stock LTI: Cardinal Health; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Astellas, BMS, BI, Bayer, AbbVie, Alexion, Adaptimmune, Ascentage, AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Eisai, EmitBio, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Greenwich, GSK, Hookipa, Incyte, Janssen, Jazz, Kite, MorphoSys, Pfizer, Taiho, Teva. B.A. Feinberg: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Cardinal Health. N. Singh: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, employee: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, carry stocks: Bristol Myers Squibb; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Proprietary Information, RWE data: Bristol Myers Squibb. C. Alonso: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, I am employed by Bristol Myers Squibb: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. M. Patel: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. L.C. Rosenblatt: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. X. Yin: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb. A. Chehrazi-Raffle: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Exelixis, Inc, Aveo Inc., Pfizer Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Exelixis, Inc, OncLive/MJH Life Sciences, ASCO Direct. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1987P - TROP-2 as a promising ADC target in penile squamous cell carcinoma that promotes cell proliferation by activating AKT through PKCα pathway
Presenter: Yi Tang
Session: Poster session 13
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13
1997P - Novel biomarker, ephrinB2 (B2), predicts resistance to treatment and poor overall survival (OS) metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Sarmad Sadeghi
Session: Poster session 13