Abstract 1712P
Background
This study investigated real-world efficacy of 1st-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NI) and its clinicopathologic predictive biomarkers in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).
Methods
This study retrospectively analyzed 455 patients with aRCC who received 1st-line NI between 2018 and 2022 at 20 centers in Korea. Primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and identifying its practical clinicopathologic biomarkers.
Results
The median age of the patients was 65 years (range, 31 to 89 years), and 77.8% were male. Most of patients were intermediate (n=285, 62.6%) or poor (n=160, 35.2%) International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. ORR was 41.5% including 4.8% of complete response, and median duration of response was 8.4 months (range 0.2-50.4). Achievement of objective response was significantly associated to male (odd ratio, OR 2.0, P=0.017), previous nephrectomy (OR 2.1, P=0.001), and lung metastasis (OR 2.4, P=0.001). With a median follow-up duration of 13.6 months (range 12.2-15.0), the median PFS and OS were 13.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7-18.4) and 51.5 months (95% CI, 34.9-68.1), respectively. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 (vs. ≥2) (hazard ratio, HR 0.7, P=0.073 and HR 0.5, P=0.007), IMDC intermediate risk (vs. poor risk) (HR 0.7, P=0.043 and HR 0.5, P=0.002), and completion of 4 cycles of NI (vs. 1-3) (HR 0.3, P<0.001 and HR 0.3, P<0.001) were significantly associated with better PFS and OS. Although using antibiotics before the initiation of NI was significantly associated with shorter OS (HR 1.7, P=0.014), durable responders showed significantly longer OS (HR 0.02, P=0.001).
Conclusions
First-line NI showed comparable real-world efficacy in Korean patients with aRCC. ECOG PS, IMDC risk, and completion of 4 cycles of NI might affect both PFS and OS. Although previous use of antibiotics might adversely affect OS, male gender, lung metastasis or prior nephrectomy might be practical predictors of objective response, which itself could predict better OS.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1708P - The clinical value of tumor-informed minimal residual disease detection in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: linhui wang
Session: Poster session 11
1709P - Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): ORACLE study
Presenter: Deepak Kilari
Session: Poster session 11
1710P - Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study
Presenter: Benoit Blanchet
Session: Poster session 11
1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?
Presenter: John McGrane
Session: Poster session 11
1713P - A deep learning approach utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) to identify cancer recurrence in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Jue Hou
Session: Poster session 11
1714P - Detection and monitoring of translocation renal cell carcinoma via epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Simon Garinet
Session: Poster session 11
1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Xu Zhang
Session: Poster session 11
1716P - Primary resistance to front-line immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARON-1)
Presenter: martina catalano
Session: Poster session 11