Abstract 1712P
Background
This study investigated real-world efficacy of 1st-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NI) and its clinicopathologic predictive biomarkers in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).
Methods
This study retrospectively analyzed 455 patients with aRCC who received 1st-line NI between 2018 and 2022 at 20 centers in Korea. Primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and identifying its practical clinicopathologic biomarkers.
Results
The median age of the patients was 65 years (range, 31 to 89 years), and 77.8% were male. Most of patients were intermediate (n=285, 62.6%) or poor (n=160, 35.2%) International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. ORR was 41.5% including 4.8% of complete response, and median duration of response was 8.4 months (range 0.2-50.4). Achievement of objective response was significantly associated to male (odd ratio, OR 2.0, P=0.017), previous nephrectomy (OR 2.1, P=0.001), and lung metastasis (OR 2.4, P=0.001). With a median follow-up duration of 13.6 months (range 12.2-15.0), the median PFS and OS were 13.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7-18.4) and 51.5 months (95% CI, 34.9-68.1), respectively. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 (vs. ≥2) (hazard ratio, HR 0.7, P=0.073 and HR 0.5, P=0.007), IMDC intermediate risk (vs. poor risk) (HR 0.7, P=0.043 and HR 0.5, P=0.002), and completion of 4 cycles of NI (vs. 1-3) (HR 0.3, P<0.001 and HR 0.3, P<0.001) were significantly associated with better PFS and OS. Although using antibiotics before the initiation of NI was significantly associated with shorter OS (HR 1.7, P=0.014), durable responders showed significantly longer OS (HR 0.02, P=0.001).
Conclusions
First-line NI showed comparable real-world efficacy in Korean patients with aRCC. ECOG PS, IMDC risk, and completion of 4 cycles of NI might affect both PFS and OS. Although previous use of antibiotics might adversely affect OS, male gender, lung metastasis or prior nephrectomy might be practical predictors of objective response, which itself could predict better OS.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1627P - Long survivors after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Long-term follow-up of GETUG-15
Presenter: Sarah Blanchet-Deverly
Session: Poster session 11
1628P - Factors influencing clinical and biological response in patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 under France's early access program
Presenter: Vincent Habouzit
Session: Poster session 11
1629P - Lutetium-177–prostate-specific membrane antigen (177Lu-PSMA) therapy in patients (pts) with prior Radium-223 (223Ra)
Presenter: Kambiz Rahbar
Session: Poster session 11
1630P - A multicenter retrospective study on the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 in microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Sandra Van Wilpe
Session: Poster session 11
1632P - Impact of androgen pathway inhibitors on cognitive function in elderly patients with metastatic prostate cancer: Results from the COG-PRO trial
Presenter: Antoine Boué
Session: Poster session 11
1634P - Does lower serum testosterone predict metastases-free survival in nmCRPC patients treated with novel antiandrogens? A post-hoc analysis of SPARTAN and ARAMIS
Presenter: Xudong Ni
Session: Poster session 11
1635P - Validation of automated bone scan index as a progression endpoint in two phase III studies of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients
Presenter: Andrea Knezevic
Session: Poster session 11